Teams

Cebulash - Who Is We?

2024 Loudoun Singles · Loudoun Singles 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2024-11-17vs Team CourtmastersWon 20
W#2 SinglesAli Montilla vs Simon Storm6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesWilson Medina vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-26Lost 01
L#3 SinglesJesse Cebulash vs Scott Johnson0-6, 0-6
2024-10-21vs Karimi - Loudoun Backhand BanditsWon 20
W#1 SinglesWilson Medina vs Matthew Trimboli7-5, 4-5
W#3 SinglesMel Wesley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-15vs Team CourtmastersSplit 11
L#2 SinglesAli Montilla vs Simon Storm3-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesMel Wesley vs Wallace Higginbotham6-1, 6-0
2024-10-12vs Karimi - Loudoun Backhand BanditsWon 21
L#1 SinglesAmal Desai vs Nobuyasu Sugimoto3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesBenoit Kroely vs Keiichi Nakatani6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesWilson Medina vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-06vs Team CourtmastersLost 01
L#2 SinglesMel Wesley vs Gaurav Chikara2-6, 6-6
2024-10-06vs Tiong- CourtmastersWon 10
W#3 SinglesJesse Cebulash vs Sunil Bedakihal6-0, 6-1
2024-10-03vs Karimi - Loudoun Backhand BanditsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAli Montilla vs Matthew Trimboli6-7, 5-2
L#3 SinglesBenoit Kroely vs Juan Salazar6-7, 3-6
2024-09-22Won 10
W#2 SinglesJesse Cebulash vs Paul Joseph6-1, 6-4
2024-09-21vs Karimi - Loudoun Backhand BanditsWon 20
W#1 SinglesAli Montilla vs Sameer Farah6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesWilson Medina vs Nobuyasu Sugimoto6-4, 7-5
2024-09-14vs Team CourtmastersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMel Wesley vs Andrew Tsai6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesBenoit Kroely vs Simon Storm3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Jesse Cebulash
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.41
Ali Montilla
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Amal Desai
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Benoit Kroely
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
3.26
Mel Wesley
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Wilson Medina
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Gautam Puranam
published
Xingchang Cheng
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jesse Cebulash + Amal Desai6072% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jesse Cebulash
330W–107L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
3.5
Ali Montilla
89W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Amal Desai
56W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3
Benoit Kroely
96W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.28
3.5
Mel Wesley
145W–106L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3
Wilson Medina
50W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
Gautam Puranam
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Xingchang Cheng
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.