Teams

Longshore Lake - Paller

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-03vs Fiddlers Creek - KeelyLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Chappell / Lynn Damico vs Linda Keely / Maureen Nowak3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-11-21vs Island Walk - SchmidtLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Chappell / Ruth Spanos vs Laura Haney / Sara Martineson3-6, 5-7
2024-11-14vs Pelican Landing - D'OlimpioWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarilyn Galbraith / Lisa Chappell vs Francine D'Olimpio / Heidi Schliem7-6, 6-3
2024-10-31vs Quail West - SeeseLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Chappell / Ruth Spanos vs Aster Leitner / Coquette Fluharty0-6, 5-7
2024-10-17vs Sterling Oaks - AldermanWon 10
W#3 DoublesClarissa Valdivia / Lisa Chappell vs Marion Malone / Deanna Fowler7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Clarissa Valdivia
published 3.5
3.37
3.29
Deborah Paller
published 3.5
3.26
Debra Fischer
published 3.5
3.10
Darlene Carpenter
published 3.5
Elsie Jerozal
published
Lisa Chappell
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Lynn Damico
published
Ruth Spanos
published
Susan Weinman
published
Terina Korda
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elsie Jerozal + Debra Fischer3646% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Chappell + Katherine MacWilliams4259% gamesnot enough data
Elsie Jerozal + Deborah Paller2346% gamesnot enough data
Katherine MacWilliams + Deborah Paller4165% gamesnot enough data
Clarissa Valdivia + Deborah Paller404 matchesnot enough data
Elsie Jerozal + Katherine MacWilliams303 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Damico + Lisa Chappell213 matchesnot enough data
Terina Korda + Katherine MacWilliams123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Clarissa Valdivia
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Katherine MacWilliams
32W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Deborah Paller
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Debra Fischer
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Darlene Carpenter
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Elsie Jerozal
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Chappell
70W–109L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Damico
64W–60L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ruth Spanos
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Weinman
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Terina Korda
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.