Teams

An.Redmond18M

2023 Cap 18 & Over Mixed · 6.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-30vs Vl.Khodush18MWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristine Potter / Michael Ratliff vs Amy Cuni / Britton Williams6-1, 6-4
2023-07-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesLauren Redmond / Alessandro Montanari vs Kate Perko / Michael Evans6-2, 6-1
2023-07-19vs Br.Shait18MLost 02
L#2 DoublesAlessandro Montanari / Leigh McClure vs Lauren Fye / Gavin Mazurak6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKristine Potter / Francisco Burbano vs CAROLINE FLAMANT / Matthew Durbin4-6, 1-6
2023-06-18vs Lo.Henry18MLost 01
L#2 DoublesAshley Grantham / Joseph Williamson vs Meghan Paris / Bryant Paris4-6, 2-6
2023-06-04vs De.Farmer18M6.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesFrancisco Burbano / Kristine Potter vs Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan / PEDRO J LEON5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAshley Grantham / Alessandro Montanari vs Stacie White / James Sinanis3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-01vs Ja.Dix18MWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaroline Walters / Alessandro Montanari vs Jared Dix / Molly Andrews6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesFrancisco Burbano / Kristine Potter vs Max Mesirow / Elaine Hudson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Michael Ratliff
published
3.35
Kristine Potter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Lauren Redmond
published
3.15
Francisco Burbano
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Joseph Williamson
published
2.98
Alessandro Montanari
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.94
Richard Johnson
published
Caroline Walters
published 3
2.73
Raul Louzao
published
2.69
Anne Redmond
published 3
2.50
Ashley Grantham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Francisco Burbano + Kristine Potter4452% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Ratliff
23W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Kristine Potter
145W–69L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
Lauren Redmond
22W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Francisco Burbano
79W–81L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Joseph Williamson
24W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Alessandro Montanari
102W–89L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%56%43%
2.98
Richard Johnson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Caroline Walters
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Raul Louzao
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Anne Redmond
15W–20L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Ashley Grantham
36W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.