Teams

Ryan

2025 Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-23vs Leary - Forest LakesLost 12
L#1 DoublesJimmy Lee / Charles Friel vs Mark Critchfield / Matt Jaggard1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLuke Fairborn vs Andreas Gahlmann6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesIan Caskill / Edward Lis vs Ed Leary / Wesley Shelley3-6, 5-7
2025-07-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesCharles Friel / Luke Fairborn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-12vs Leary - Forest LakesWon 10
W#3 DoublesEdward Lis / Steven Skalak vs Ben Jorgensen / David Bowerman6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2025-07-09vs DeSouza - Acac acersWon 10
W#1 SinglesCharles Friel vs Derek Frazier6-3, 6-0
2025-06-28vs Leary - Forest LakesLost 01
L#2 DoublesEdward Lis / Steven Skalak vs Benjamin Baker / Wesley Shelley7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-06-25vs DeSouza - Acac acersWon 10
W#1 DoublesIan Caskill / David Harmon vs Derek Frazier / Pat BRadley6-3, 6-0
2025-06-18vs Leary - Forest LakesWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Harmon / Ian Caskill vs Mark Critchfield / Ed Leary3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLuke Fairborn vs Matt Jaggard4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Ryan / Edward Lis vs Ben Jorgensen / Andreas Gahlmann6-1, 6-0
2025-06-11vs DeSouza - Acac acersWon 30
W#1 DoublesJimmy Lee / Luke Fairborn vs Stephen Smith / Swapnil Sonkusare6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Harmon / Ian Caskill vs Henry Hickman / Carl Kiehn6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCharles Friel / Edward Lis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
David Harmon
published 4
4.00
Rushman Andrews
published
3.90
Luke Fairborn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.87
Charles Friel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.84
Henry Clifford III
published
3.74
Ian Caskill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Andrew Watson
published 4
3.55
Nikos Nikolopoulos
published
3.50
Edward Lis
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
William Gordon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Friel + Luke Fairborn6266% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Harmon
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
4.14
Rushman Andrews
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Luke Fairborn
99W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Charles Friel
71W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
Henry Clifford III
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Ian Caskill
71W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Andrew Watson
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Nikos Nikolopoulos
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Edward Lis
136W–133L career · 5 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
William Gordon
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.