Teams

Fabbro - RS Clay

2024 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 2.80 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-20vs Escambia/Wilson/18&Over6.0MXDLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Ashley Welter vs Leigh Diamond / Nick Farkas3-6, 2-6
2024-08-13vs Quinn - SHLWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Meekins / Melanie Bell vs Joe Patroni / Shari Essex6-1, 6-1
2024-07-30vs Harvey - PCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Tanya Young vs Ansli Brown / Evan Covington6-2, 6-4
2024-07-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Amelia Murphy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-16vs Ross - RS HardWon 20
W#2 DoublesMatthew Meekins / Melanie Bell vs Cheryl Vann / Scott Mayberry6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Tanya Young vs Monika Greene / Rick Greene6-0, 6-4
2024-07-09vs DellaFera - RS HardLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Meekins / Melanie Bell vs James Holmes / Wendy McIntosh Holmes3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-06-25vs Tran - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Ashley Welter vs Victor Agadzi / Michelle Patterson6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Robert Fabbro
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Brooklyn Meadows
published 3.5
3.33
John Whittenberger
published
3.29
Melanie Bell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.09
Ryan Worley
published
3.02
Kaye Whittenberger
published
2.99
Addison van Pelt
published 3
2.86
Zach Pohlmann
published
2.57
Tanya Young
published
2.52
Brian Young
published 2.5
Amelia Murphy
published 2.5
Ashley Welter
published 2.5
Matthew Meekins
published
Sharon Powell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanya Young + Brian Young314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Fabbro
143W–78L career · 12 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
3.5
Brooklyn Meadows
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
John Whittenberger
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Melanie Bell
39W–28L career · 10 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Ryan Worley
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.09
Kaye Whittenberger
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Addison van Pelt
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
Zach Pohlmann
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
Tanya Young
16W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%31%69%
2.57
2.5
Brian Young
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
0%44%56%
2.52
2.5
Amelia Murphy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Ashley Welter
2W–0L career · type M · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew Meekins
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Powell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.