Teams

Lata40/BullOCK/SSP

2025 Adult 40 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 3.0 - Night

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-25vs LATA40/Geib/CAMPLost 04
L#1 DoublesKaren Brown / Diana Howard vs Anne Belue / Beverly Campbell6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJamie Hunter / Connie Halstead vs Lisette Geib / Beth Belcher3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTraci Shannon Caldwell-Smith / Kathy Geer vs Libby Hagins / Juanita Bowens4-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesElizabeth Riley / Lindsay Copelan vs Kristen Sojourner / Jenny Burden2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.0 - Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Natalie Lehman
published
2.92
JJ Burton
published
2.85
Gail Harrison
published
2.83
Elizabeth Fernandes
published
2.73
Jamie Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Connie Halstead
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Diana Howard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Marijo Bullock
published
2.61
Traci Shannon Caldwell-Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Elizabeth Riley
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Kathy Geer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Lindsay Copelan
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Kelly Glynn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Copelan + Kelly Glynn134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Lehman
37W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.09
JJ Burton
66W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Gail Harrison
137W–141L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Elizabeth Fernandes
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
Jamie Hunter
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Connie Halstead
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Diana Howard
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Marijo Bullock
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Traci Shannon Caldwell-Smith
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Elizabeth Riley
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Kathy Geer
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Lindsay Copelan
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Kelly Glynn
27W–47L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.