Teams

TCRC-Hall

2026 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Everett Hettema
published 4
3.15
Donna Hall
published 3.5
3.01
2.92
Charlie Chien Le
published 3.5
2.89
Joseph Piwowarski
published
2.62
Carol Draper
published 3
Nat Draper
published
Ngan Dinh
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Everett Hettema
14W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
4.00
3.5
Donna Hall
13W–21L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Amanda Stoneburner
16W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3.5
Charlie Chien Le
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.92
Joseph Piwowarski
13W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Carol Draper
1W–9L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.62
Nat Draper
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ngan Dinh
7W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.