Teams

Ma.LaPlante40C

2025 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.28 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-05vs Pa.Cochran40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeanette Gerould / Maggie Patterson vs Regina Davis / Carol Vervaert6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMaggie LaPlante / Karen Southern vs Christine Martin / Alise Fredrickson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusanne Knowles / Sarah Glover vs Amy Ellis / Paula Cochran6-3, 6-2
2025-10-01vs Ma.Slaymaker40CLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Schmalz / Ryland Herring vs Katie Percy / Summer DuMont6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Southern / Susanne Knowles vs Stacey Giglio / Emma Coblentz7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJeanette Gerould / Danielle Stringer vs Jennifer Kazmierczak / Michelle Eisenberg7-6, 6-3
2025-09-24vs Ch.Burr40CWon 21
W#1 DoublesRyland Herring / Maggie Patterson vs Camille Conzola / Hope Graney6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmanda Bauer / Debra Hauge vs Takako Schenberger / Julie Liddle6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaggie LaPlante / Sarah Glover vs Julie Karg / Christine Burr5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2025-09-23vs Ch.Kopp40CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusanne Knowles / Laura Bell vs Mandi Chappell / Crystal Smith3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErica Rankin / Jeanette Gerould vs Charlotte Kopp / Inma Navarro Galisteo6-0, 6-4
2025-09-03vs Yv.Barrow40C6.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSusanne Knowles / Ryland Herring vs Elizabeth Matthews / MA Allen0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Bauer / Karen Southern vs Cameron Ellerbe / April Taylor2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Bell / Maggie LaPlante vs Julia Kerr / Traci Kornegay1-6, 5-7
2025-08-27vs Di.Williams40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaggie Patterson / Ryland Herring vs Laurie Reiss / Laurie Compiano6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Bell / Erica Rankin vs Karen Cody / Malinda Schantz7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusanne Knowles / Sarah Glover vs Elisebeth Gelardi / Tina Parker6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-20vs Mi.Spangenberg40CLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Bauer / Karen Southern vs Michelle Spangenberg / Susan Newton4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaggie LaPlante / Jeanette Gerould vs Lindsey Guccia / Brigette Flower2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesErica Rankin / Debra Hauge vs Casey Hale / Linda Chuang3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Maggie Patterson
published
3.34
Maggie LaPlante
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.32
Danielle Stringer
published 3.5
3.32
Amanda Bauer
published 3.5
3.22
Susanne Knowles
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.19
Erica Rankin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Jeanette Gerould
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.03
Ryland Herring
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Debra Hauge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Karen Southern
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Hauge + Karen Southern5548% games+4.4% vs expected
Susanne Knowles + Maggie LaPlante8950% games+0.1% vs expected
Maggie LaPlante + Erica Rankin8650% gamesnot enough data
Debra Hauge + Erica Rankin7262% gamesnot enough data
Debra Hauge + Ryland Herring4159% gamesnot enough data
Maggie LaPlante + Jeanette Gerould2338% gamesnot enough data
Susanne Knowles + Erica Rankin224 matchesnot enough data
Susanne Knowles + Jeanette Gerould123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Patterson
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Maggie LaPlante
95W–120L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Danielle Stringer
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Amanda Bauer
13W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Susanne Knowles
94W–122L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Erica Rankin
61W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Jeanette Gerould
69W–76L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Ryland Herring
80W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Debra Hauge
73W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Karen Southern
87W–112L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.