← Teams

CAC-Day

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.7 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Adina Talpos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.63
Tami McAra
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.36
Michele Snyder
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Lisa Clevenger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Barbara Seatter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Results5 ties
2020-03-08Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesAdina Talpos vs Ilsa Teppo6-0, 7-5
2020-02-16Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesBarbara Seatter / Elda Nelson vs Flor Harrigan / Takumi Koyama6-4, 6-2
2020-01-25Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesAdina Talpos / Tami McAra vs Carla Wheeler / Cathy Gatzke7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBarbara Seatter / Elda Nelson vs Julie Hansen / Susan Ford6-3, 6-3
2020-01-11Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesTami McAra / Lisa Clevenger vs Sarah Ferrer / Tarynn Berkman6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesBarbara Seatter vs Kelsey Steinhorst6-2, 6-1
2020-01-04Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesElda Nelson / Barbara Seatter vs Linda Binns / Cindy Rushall6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLisa Clevenger / Michele Snyder vs Lucia von Flotow / Naomi Steinberg7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Adina Talpos
31W–29L career
not enough data
—
4
Tami McAra
148W–117L career
6%94%0%
3.63
3.5
Michele Snyder
149W–123L career
0%97%2%
3.36
3.5
Lisa Clevenger
25W–50L career
0%98%1%
3.32
3.5
Barbara Seatter
48W–60L career
1%97%2%
3.30

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.