← Teams

WHRC-Webb

2022 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Steven Grant
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.03
Scott Dickinson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.96
Sheila Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.92
DeWayne Ledbetter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Jonathan Guinn
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.21
Pamela Grant
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
—
Robert Burlingame
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 0
Results8 ties
2022-05-21Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSheila Schmidt / Scott Dickinson vs William Place / Gina Mandel7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJaReda Webb / Jonathan Guinn vs Susanne Cochran / Patrick Priest7-5, 6-3
2022-05-15Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSheila Schmidt / Scott Dickinson vs Patries Ferguson / Paul Garrahan6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJaReda Webb / DeWayne Ledbetter vs Kim Wright / Fred Buller6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPamela Grant / Steven Grant vs Sally Papadimas / Robert Crawford6-3, 6-1
2022-05-01Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSusan Eldridge / Jonathan Guinn vs Teresa Darling / Steven Darling6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJaReda Webb / Robert Burlingame vs Tomoko Langworthy / Mike Olson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSheila Schmidt / Jonathan Guinn vs Sharon Place / William Place6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPamela Grant / Steven Grant vs Sara Meier / JAMES KYUNG6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJaReda Webb / Robert Burlingame vs Karla Hendrickson / Patrick Priest6-4, 7-6
2022-04-22Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSheila Schmidt / Jonathan Guinn vs Anne Mangan / Zachary Wright6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPamela Grant / Steven Grant vs Sally Papadimas / Paul Garrahan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJaReda Webb / DeWayne Ledbetter vs Teresa Darling / Steven Darling6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Thompson / Robert Burlingame vs Andrew Geisler / Bridget Raach5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPamela Grant / Steven Grant vs Nancy Duncan / Jim Boyer6-4, 6-3
2022-04-13Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSusan Eldridge / Jonathan Guinn vs Kay Hallmark / Gary Hallmark2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSheila Schmidt / Scott Dickinson vs Julie Nichols / Brian Chenoweth6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Thompson / Robert Burlingame vs Dorothy Cofield / Kip Stevenson7-5, 6-2
2022-04-10Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesJaReda Webb / DeWayne Ledbetter vs Kay Hallmark / Gary Hallmark6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPamela Grant / Steven Grant vs Julie Nichols / Manuel Karlin6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Steven Grant
92W–60L career
0%44%56%
3.13
3
Scott Dickinson
106W–81L career · type A
0%76%24%
3.03
3.5
Sheila Schmidt
38W–69L career
44%56%0%
2.96
3
DeWayne Ledbetter
51W–55L career
2%79%19%
2.92
3
Jonathan Guinn
45W–76L career
1%98%1%
2.76
2.5
Pamela Grant
35W–45L career
0%95%5%
2.21
0
Robert Burlingame
18W–35L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.