← Teams

VTC-Nadig

2022 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.8 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Everett Frank
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Peter Aleman
published 4
3.62
Kevin Muck
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Nikki Nadig
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.61
Susan Ford
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.56
JT Smith
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.43
Alan Jones
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Jim Wheeler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Denise Dawkins
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.09
Lisa Provost
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Tim Buck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 0
Results8 ties
2022-06-03Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesNikki Nadig / Kevin Muck vs Danny Denning / Brenda Falson0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJim Wheeler / Kim Wheeler vs Jerome Deluz / Kristen Fisher6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPeter Aleman / Denise Dawkins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-15Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesEverett Frank / Lisa Provost vs Frank Collie / Mary Lowblad6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSusan Ford / Kevin Muck vs Stefan Olander / Kyoko Adcock3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNikki Nadig / JT Smith vs Michelle Donato / Bill Lowblad7-5, 6-2
2022-05-07Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesPeter Aleman / Denise Dawkins vs Catherine Go / Bill Henderson6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAlan Jones / Nikki Nadig vs John Hall / Terri Pickard4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Agee / JT Smith vs Kim Stevens / Kit Johnson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-30Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesPeter Aleman / Denise Dawkins vs Jonathan Quon / Karen Groenweghe7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEverett Frank / Lisa Provost vs Tom Lonergan / Roxanne Imbrie6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJT Smith / Nikki Nadig vs Kevin Oloughlin / Colleen Hamilton6-2, 6-2
2022-04-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesNikki Nadig / Tim Buck vs Jeroen Swanborn / Chrys Culver6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPeter Aleman / Denise Dawkins vs Jae Joon Kang / Lynne Gaerisch6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Ford / Alan Jones vs Shelly Perkins / Wesley Perkins6-4, 6-1
2022-04-10Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAlan Jones / Susan Ford vs Frank Collie / Mary Lowblad7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNikki Nadig / Kevin Muck vs Michelle Donato / Lee Crockett6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJim Wheeler / Kim Wheeler vs Sue Harrison / Stefan Olander6-2, 6-3
2022-04-02Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAlan Jones / Susan Ford vs Jae Joon Kang / Babette Zielinski7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEverett Frank / Lisa Provost vs Karen Sullivan / John van Leeuwen6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJT Smith / Susan Agee vs Donald Pettitt / Anita Havemann6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-18Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSusan Ford / Alan Jones vs Heidi Wilcox / John Hall6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKim Wheeler / Jim Wheeler vs Linda Lovett / Jack Henry6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNikki Nadig / Tim Buck vs Sally Lovett / Kit Johnson6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Everett Frank
32W–64L career
not enough data
—
4
Peter Aleman
16W–16L career · type S
not enough data
—
4
Kevin Muck
64W–90L career
9%91%0%
3.62
4
Nikki Nadig
71W–60L career
12%88%0%
3.62
4
Susan Ford
38W–107L career · type S
11%89%0%
3.61
4
JT Smith
83W–90L career
20%80%0%
3.56
3.5
Alan Jones
96W–69L career
0%92%8%
3.43
3.5
Jim Wheeler
60W–69L career
0%98%1%
3.31
3.5
Denise Dawkins
59W–54L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Lisa Provost
37W–120L career
19%81%0%
3.09
0
Tim Buck
5W–7L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.