Teams

MP:SplitSteppers:Criscitiello

2026 ME Adult 65 & Over Women · 6.0 65 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-13vs Apex:DoyleLost 12
W#1 DoublesWendy Greenbaum / Barbara Fraumeni vs Charlotte Pease / Susan Thompson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Criscitiello / Elaine Bell vs Diana Doyle / Nancy Osborne2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Wong / Martha Janeway vs Catalina Mehler / Linda Coupe1-6, 3-6
2026-06-06vs Apex:MagantiLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebbie Stevenson / Katherine Harding vs Rebecca Love / Theresa Sullivan6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Zellinger / Alyson Cummings vs Philomena Ostapchuk / Tana Leonhart2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Fraumeni / Janet Wong vs Julie Faure / Marykay Cooney6-3, 6-1
2026-05-31vs Apex:DoyleLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Criscitiello / Alyson Cummings vs Diana Doyle / Susan Thompson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Zellinger / Elaine Bell vs Jennifer Alcock / Catalina Mehler1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDebbie Stevenson / Barbara Fraumeni vs Linda Coupe / Marian Paull6-3, 6-2
2026-05-31vs Apex:MagantiWon 21
W#1 DoublesWendy Greenbaum / Debbie Stevenson vs Tana Leonhart / MERYL E Nierman6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMary McKone / Katherine Harding vs Philomena Ostapchuk / Susan Robbins6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanet Wong / Martha Janeway vs Marykay Cooney / Julie Faure4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-16vs Apex:MagantiLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlyson Cummings / Katherine Harding vs Rebecca Love / Theresa Sullivan3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesWendy Greenbaum / Cindy Fahay vs Philomena Ostapchuk / Julie Faure3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Criscitiello / Mary McKone vs Tana Leonhart / Marykay Cooney6-0, 6-2
2026-05-09vs Apex:DoyleLost 12
L#1 DoublesMargaret Zellinger / Mary McKone vs Diana Doyle / Susan Thompson2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWendy Greenbaum / Debbie Stevenson vs Catalina Mehler / Marsha Traill7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Criscitiello / Cindy Fahay vs Nancy Osborne / Marian Paull3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0 65 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Apex:Doyle6013511123
2Apex:Maganti2471124175
3MP:SplitSteppers:Criscitiello1571125183

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Wendy Greenbaum
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Barbara Fraumeni
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Cindy Fahay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Elaine Bell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Alyson Cummings
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Katherine Harding
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Margaret Zellinger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Debbie Stevenson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Janet Wong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Criscitiello
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Martha Janeway
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary McKone
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Fraumeni + Wendy Greenbaum7355% games−0.6% vs expected
Wendy Greenbaum + Alyson Cummings4353% games−4.1% vs expected
Julie Criscitiello + Cindy Fahay3255% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Greenbaum + Julie Criscitiello314 matchesnot enough data
Alyson Cummings + Julie Criscitiello224 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Harding + Barbara Fraumeni123 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Fraumeni + Janet Wong213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Greenbaum
102W–125L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
Barbara Fraumeni
22W–33L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Cindy Fahay
8W–16L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Elaine Bell
14W–32L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Alyson Cummings
31W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
Katherine Harding
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Margaret Zellinger
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Debbie Stevenson
28W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.59
Janet Wong
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie Criscitiello
15W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Martha Janeway
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary McKone
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.