Teams

Colonial Country Club - Dunbar

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Combo 50 & Over Summer · 7.5 W

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-29vs LEECHAR/ShotwellLost 02
L#2 DoublesKaren Dunbar / Mei-Mei Kirk vs Michelle Koeppel / Ana Monahan2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Brodsky / Teresa Regelmann vs Sheri Coleman / Kim Shotwell2-6, 0-6
2025-09-22vs Courts at Cape Coral - RiccioWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Conrad / Christine Brodsky vs Kim McCartney / Robin Riccio4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-25vs LEECHAR/ShotwellLost 01
L#3 DoublesAndre Margaux / Karen Dunbar vs Cynthia Sabatino / Florentina Fessel2-6, 3-6
2025-08-02vs LEECHAR/ShotwellSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAndre Margaux / Christine Brodsky vs Sheri Coleman / Kim Shotwell5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMissy Rothweiler / Karen Dunbar vs Patricia Duquette / Ana Monahan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-14vs Courts at Cape Coral - RiccioLost 01
L#1 DoublesRomina Ravenna / Christine Brodsky vs Kimberly Royal / Heather Humann7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Andre Margaux
published 3.5
3.21
Lisa DeLauder
published
3.11
Christine Brodsky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jean McKinney
published
Karen Dunbar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kathie Karp
published
Kimberly Harrsch
published
Mei-Mei Kirk
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rachel Conrad
published
Romina Ravenna
published
Teresa Regelmann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Dunbar + Christine Brodsky2343% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andre Margaux
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Lisa DeLauder
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Christine Brodsky
23W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Jean McKinney
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Dunbar
38W–76L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathie Karp
66W–71L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Harrsch
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mei-Mei Kirk
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Conrad
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Romina Ravenna
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Regelmann
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.