Teams

Myers/JB/RPCC

2025 Adult 40 & Over Spring league 2.5-4.0 · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-28vs Goodart-Sandusky/JB/APWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Reba / Tara Smith vs Donna Jones / Danae Sandusky7-5, 0-1
2025-04-13vs Goodart-Sandusky/JB/APLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelli Adkins / Michele Reba vs Molly Goodart / Donna Jones2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Gibson / Christy Wortham vs Amy Burnett / Kristie Becker6-7, 4-6
2025-04-11vs LParker/JB/JCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTiffany Floyd / Amy Gibson vs Tera Harpole / Caroline Wilson4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTara Smith / Michele Reba vs June Long / Janeene Lynch6-2, 6-1
2025-04-01vs LParker/JB/JCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrandy Johnston / Christy Wortham vs Lauren Parker / Janeene Lynch2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesTiffany Floyd vs Tera Harpole4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Reba / Tara Smith vs June Long / Caroline Wilson6-1, 6-2
2025-03-09vs LParker/JB/JCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGloria Faircloth / Tiffany Floyd vs Kimberly Moseley / Janeene Lynch6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrandy Johnston / Lori Smith vs Renee Cobern / June Long3-6, 5-7
2025-03-06vs Goodart-Sandusky/JB/APLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelli Adkins / Gloria Faircloth vs Molly Goodart / Jamie Smith0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTiffany Floyd / Amy Gibson vs Donna Jones / Jamie Chandler1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Tara Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Gloria Faircloth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Tiffany Floyd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.42
Michele Reba
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.29
Kelli Adkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Christy Wortham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.22
Amy Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.11
Brandy Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Smith + Michele Reba303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tara Smith
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%10%90%
2.68
Gloria Faircloth
8W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%50%50%
2.50
Tiffany Floyd
16W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
Michele Reba
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
Kelli Adkins
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Christy Wortham
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Amy Gibson
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Brandy Johnston
9W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.