Teams

CLAREMONT R and S 55AM7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Men 7.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Scott Straus
published
3.41
Simon Rabe-Hesketh
published
3.36
Benjamin Cha
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Pete May
published
3.25
Henry Sobel
published
3.23
Bradley Wrubel
published 3.5
3.21
Steven Finley
published
3.13
Gary Greenfield
published
3.13
Jason Cohn
published
3.12
Adam Cheyer
published 3.5
3.10
Edward Maxwell
published
2.87
Jon Bendich
published
2.83
Holden Hume
published
2.64
Walter Cecka
published
John Henshaw
published
Taeku Lee
published
Vivek Hutheesing
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bradley Wrubel + Simon Rabe-Hesketh8555% games+2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Straus
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
Simon Rabe-Hesketh
16W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Benjamin Cha
64W–60L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Pete May
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.31
Henry Sobel
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Bradley Wrubel
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
Steven Finley
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Gary Greenfield
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Jason Cohn
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Adam Cheyer
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Edward Maxwell
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Jon Bendich
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
Holden Hume
7W–22L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
Walter Cecka
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
John Henshaw
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Taeku Lee
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vivek Hutheesing
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.