Teams

Walker 5.5 40+

2026 Combo 40 & Over · 5.5 Adult 40 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-31vs Reeves 5.5 40+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Hargett / Bethany Honey vs Paula Pounders / Tracie Thompson2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDana Hill / Tori Bendall vs Melissa Aycock / Rita Fisher6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTammy Willis / Rhonda Pounders vs Amy Reeves / Julie Newell5-7, 4-6
2026-08-27vs Reeves 5.5 40+Won 21
L#1 DoublesNina McNatt / Melissa Hargett vs Emily Hammock / Paula Pounders0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRhonda Pounders / Tori Bendall vs Theresa Burns / Veronica Stancil6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBethany Honey / Dana Hill vs Amy Reeves / Julie Newell3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-24vs Reeves 5.5 40+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNina McNatt / Tori Bendall vs Emily Hammock / Jill Archer6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Walker / Melissa Hargett vs Rita Fisher / Melissa Aycock4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTammy Willis / Amanda Davis vs Tracie Thompson / Veronica Stancil4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-08-10vs Reeves 5.5 40+Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCindy Walker / Nina McNatt vs Jill Archer / Tracie Thompson6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTori Bendall / Lorie Scott vs Rita Fisher / Paula Pounders5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Davis / Bethany Honey vs Theresa Burns / Veronica Stancil3-6, 3-6
2026-08-03vs Reeves 5.5 40+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Walker / Lorie Scott vs Amy Reeves / Rita Fisher1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTammy Willis / Amanda Davis vs Paula Pounders / Tracie Thompson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNina McNatt / Rhonda Pounders vs Melissa Aycock / Theresa Burns6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.5 Adult 40 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Reeves 5.5 40+2051339
2Walker 5.5 40+02151067

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Tammy Willis
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.49
Tori Bendall
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.44
Cindy Walker
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.33
Bethany Honey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.31
Nina McNatt
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.25
Rhonda Pounders
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.24
Melissa Hargett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.92
Lorie Scott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Willis + Cindy Walker4351% games+10.4% vs expected
Rhonda Pounders + Tori Bendall6355% games+6.1% vs expected
Rhonda Pounders + Nina McNatt1539% games−7.1% vs expected
Melissa Hargett + Nina McNatt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Willis
18W–36L career · 7 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Tori Bendall
17W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
3
Cindy Walker
26W–35L career · 7 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
3
Bethany Honey
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.33
Nina McNatt
23W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
Rhonda Pounders
16W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
Melissa Hargett
11W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.24
Lorie Scott
2W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.