Teams

Crawford

2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Combined

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-08-10vs Too Fit To Quit (Chi/Yang)Won 21
W#1 DoublesLynn Crawford / David Gorecki vs Becky Hall / Jay Lyons6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Geiselhart / Art Staden vs Wendy Yang / Ahn Lam2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Lord-Schaaf / Rob Armstrong vs Nancy Saccone / Stephen Lewis5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-09vs ElverhoyLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Grieshaber / Donna Geiselhart vs Cheryl Perlmutter / Stuart Friess3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLynn Crawford / David Gorecki vs Rebecca Welton / Charles Welton3-6, 4-6
2025-08-09vs ElverhoyLost 02
L#1 DoublesLynn Crawford / David Gorecki vs Mary Hartman / Charles Welton2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesArt Staden / Regan Hannigan vs Wesley Law / Cajal Sumino6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2025-08-06vs STL/Shouldis/40&Over8.0XLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaul Ackermann / Regan Hannigan vs Heidy Weicht / Sam Shouldis5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Gorecki / Lynn Crawford vs Patricia Fry / Keith Allison1-6, 2-6
2025-07-26vs Too Fit To Quit (Chi/Yang)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Gorecki / Lynn Crawford vs Jay Lyons / Grace Chi6-7, 4-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesArt Staden / Susan Daigle vs Ahn Lam / Wendy Yang0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesScott Grieshaber / Linda Lord-Schaaf vs Jason Ariston / Kimberly Hammond3-6, 2-6
2025-07-13vs STL/Shouldis/40&Over8.0XLost 12
W#1 DoublesRegan Hannigan / Art Staden vs Sam Shouldis / Lisa Campbell6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLinda Lord-Schaaf / Rob Armstrong vs Patricia Fry / Keith Allison2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Gorecki / Melissa Kantrovitz vs Marianne Sokup / Thomas Wheeland1-6, 6-7
2025-06-29vs ElverhoyLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaul Ackermann / Melissa Kantrovitz vs Mary Hartman / Robert McKendry1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRegan Hannigan / Bryan Rigby vs David Carr / Sujani Narayan5-7, 6-7
2025-06-22vs Too Fit To Quit (Chi/Yang)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRob Armstrong / Regan Hannigan vs Jay Lyons / Becky Hall3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaul Ackermann / Sheri Xu vs Ahn Lam / Junko Oba2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesScott Grieshaber / Susan Daigle vs Jason Ariston / Kimberly Hammond5-7, 5-4, 1-0
2025-06-08vs STL/Shouldis/40&Over8.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesRegan Hannigan / Art Staden vs Florence Streeter / Sam Shouldis6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBryan Rigby / Lynn Crawford vs Felice Rolnick / Keith Allison7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Lord-Schaaf / Rob Armstrong vs Severine Huchet / Bryan Jarvis3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Combined have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Linda Lord-Schaaf
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.78
Sheri Xu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Paul Ackermann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Melissa Kantrovitz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Bryan Rigby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Art Staden
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.61
Donna Geiselhart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Regan Hannigan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
David Gorecki
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Rob Armstrong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Scott Grieshaber
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Susan Daigle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lynn Crawford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Art Staden + Regan Hannigan3449% games−4.2% vs expected
Paul Ackermann + Linda Lord-Schaaf6352% games−4.9% vs expected
Art Staden + Donna Geiselhart044 matchesnot enough data
Art Staden + Sheri Xu213 matchesnot enough data
Linda Lord-Schaaf + Rob Armstrong123 matchesnot enough data
Bryan Rigby + Regan Hannigan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Lord-Schaaf
173W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.05
Sheri Xu
139W–63L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
Paul Ackermann
76W–99L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.70
Melissa Kantrovitz
28W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Bryan Rigby
68W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Art Staden
103W–125L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Donna Geiselhart
94W–78L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.61
Regan Hannigan
172W–182L career · 6 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
David Gorecki
91W–103L career · 6 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Rob Armstrong
57W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Scott Grieshaber
14W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
Susan Daigle
52W–82L career · 2 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.36
Lynn Crawford
70W–34L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.