Teams

Phayer/55's/4.0/Man/HJC

2025 Slidell Adult 55 & Over - Men · 4.0 Slidell (55&O) Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.17 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-22vs Calamari/55's/4.0/Sli/HJCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJay Butcher / Kevin Phayer vs Daniel Brennan / Ernest Anderson6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew McQuaid / William Spiess vs Donald Geier / Hal Neitzschman7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMark Ferrer / Anthony Priola vs Brian Harrison / Pablo Gomez6-3, 6-2
2025-03-22vs Calamari/55's/4.0/Sli/HJCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJay Butcher / Anthony Priola vs Kevin Leblanc / Donald Geier6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMark Ferrer / Chris Kobrock vs Hal Neitzschman / Henry P Calamari6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAndrew McQuaid / William Spiess vs Pablo Gomez / Brian Harrison7-6, 6-4
2025-03-06vs Calamari/55's/4.0/Sli/HJCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Ferrer / Anthony Priola vs Ernest Anderson / Henry P Calamari6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJay Butcher / William Spiess vs Patrick Hays / Chuck Truglio6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKevin Phayer / Chris Kobrock vs Paul Clinkscales / Kevin Leblanc6-2, 6-2
2025-03-06vs Calamari/55's/4.0/Sli/HJCWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Kobrock / William Spiess vs Ernest Anderson / Daniel Brennan6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJay Butcher / Mark Ferrer vs Henry P Calamari / Patrick Hays6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKevin Phayer / Anthony Priola vs Chuck Truglio / Paul Clinkscales6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Slidell (55&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anthony Priola
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.84
Chris Kobrock
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Andrew McQuaid
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Jay Butcher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kevin Phayer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Ferrer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
William Spiess
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Spiess + Andrew McQuaid303 matchesnot enough data
Anthony Priola + Mark Ferrer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anthony Priola
9W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Chris Kobrock
10W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Andrew McQuaid
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jay Butcher
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Kevin Phayer
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Ferrer
7W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Spiess
6W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.