Teams

Fritchie/7.5/55/CWD/NOLTC

2026 NO Southern Combo 55 & Over - Women Day · 7.5 NO (55&O) Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · 7.5 NO (55&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Taylor/7.5/55/CWD/MCC000000
2Blosser/7.5/55/CWD/TTCC000000
3Lafont/7.5/55/CWD/GACC000000
4Fritchie/7.5/55/CWD/NOLTC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Michele Prokop
published
3.40
Dodie Powers
published
3.40
Kyle Kehoe
published
3.39
Elizabeth Todd
published
3.35
Carlotta Fritchie
published 3.5
Andree Hainkel
published 3.5
Cheryl Redfearn
published 3.5
3.22
Renee Labadie
published
3.22
Lisa Petagna
published
3.18
Anne Hughs
published 3
3.14
Joan Hyman
published
Marylou Freiberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kyle Kehoe + Renee Labadie2346% games+1.0% vs expected
Kyle Kehoe + Anne Hughs213 matchesnot enough data
Renee Labadie + Anne Hughs213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michele Prokop
10W–11L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Dodie Powers
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Kyle Kehoe
25W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Elizabeth Todd
19W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Carlotta Fritchie
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
3.5
Andree Hainkel
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Cheryl Redfearn
7W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Renee Labadie
28W–32L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
Lisa Petagna
14W–3L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Anne Hughs
66W–40L career · no lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Joan Hyman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Marylou Freiberg
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.