Teams

DHaney

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Tri-Level · 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.43 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLiz Broadway / Michele Fitzsimons vs Lisa Kempf / Kimberly Patrey4-6, 1-6
2022-07-30vs CLetcherWon 10
W#3 DoublesCecilia Edgar / Erica Walton vs Beth Rea / Jane Diepenbrock6-1, 6-3
2022-07-09vs TriTulenkoLost 01
L#3 DoublesCecilia Edgar / Beth Robertson vs Kelly Zargo / Frederica Shipman2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-06-25Split 11
W#1 DoublesDara Haney / Liz Broadway vs Keisha Price / QUEEN HARGROVE3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSharon Fred / Cecilia Edgar vs Kristen Gillispie / Elizabeth Taylor5-7, 4-6
2022-06-04Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLiz Broadway / Cary Brege vs Christine Letcher / Tori Sutler2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Yuwie Hager
published 4
3.61
Cary Brege
published 4
3.48
Dara Haney
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.19
Michele Fitzsimons
published
3.12
Liz Broadway
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Kelly Sutton
published
3.07
Susan Wilkerson
published
3.05
Kelleigh Russo
published
2.90
Sharon Fred
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.82
Beth Robertson
published 3
2.71
Cecilia Edgar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dara Haney + Kelly Sutton5159% games+4.4% vs expected
Dara Haney + Beth Robertson404 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Fred + Cecilia Edgar224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Wilkerson + Dara Haney303 matchesnot enough data
Susan Wilkerson + Kelleigh Russo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Yuwie Hager
170W–78L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
4.00
4
Cary Brege
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Dara Haney
188W–138L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
3.48
Michele Fitzsimons
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Liz Broadway
86W–90L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.12
Kelly Sutton
10W–12L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
Susan Wilkerson
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.07
Kelleigh Russo
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Sharon Fred
151W–155L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Beth Robertson
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Cecilia Edgar
284W–255L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.