Teams

GSTL55/Siembida/Wachesaw

2025 Adult 55 & Over - GSTL · Adult Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-13vs GSTL55/Pendleton/KingstonLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Kaminski / Susan Chittick vs Diana Pendleton / Faith Bowling4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJeannine Siembida / Jennifer Walsh vs Dayle Oakley / Katherine Helton7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJean Morris / Cheryl Haugh vs Lila Diefenderfer / Cindy Trumbower6-7, 1-6
2025-04-06vs GSTL55/Phillips/PrestwickLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Chittick / Linda Kaminski vs Tara Barr / Melinda Hyman6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl Haugh / Jean Morris vs Theresa Felkel / Pandra Johnston0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJeannine Siembida / Jennifer Walsh vs Nicole Mattingly / Ann McElreath6-1, 4-1
2025-03-02vs GSTL55/Phillips/PrestwickLost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda Kaminski / Samantha Saber vs Margaret Phillips / Karen Walker6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Chittick / Cherie Gerstmyer vs Tara Barr / Melinda Hyman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMartha Fitchett / Jennifer Walsh vs Nicole Mattingly / Ann McElreath3-6, 4-6
2025-02-22vs GSTL55/Pendleton/KingstonWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Walsh / Samantha Saber vs Diana Pendleton / Cindy Trumbower1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeannine Siembida / Cheryl Haugh vs Katherine Helton / Danuta Gabriel6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCherie Gerstmyer / Martha Fitchett vs Dayle Oakley / Shannon Edwards3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cherie Gerstmyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Jeannine Siembida
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Susan Chittick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Cheryl Haugh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Debbie Altman
published 3
2.49
Martha Fitchett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Jean Morris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Amanda Casey
published
Linda Kaminski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Samantha Saber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Kaminski + Susan Chittick033 matchesnot enough data
Jean Morris + Cheryl Haugh033 matchesnot enough data
Susan Chittick + Cherie Gerstmyer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cherie Gerstmyer
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeannine Siembida
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Susan Chittick
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Cheryl Haugh
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Debbie Altman
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Martha Fitchett
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Jean Morris
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.28
Amanda Casey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Kaminski
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samantha Saber
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.