Teams

BC-MCC/EricSmith

2025 SO CAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Men - 4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesTony Rojko / Andrew Radden vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-22vs BC-Kramer/KevinEscobarWon 10
W#1 DoublesHenry Coia / Andrew Radden vs John Post / Wade Murphy6-2, 6-2
2025-10-25vs BC-PVTC/ChadMacAllisterWon 10
W#1 DoublesEric Smith / Andrew Radden vs Shawn Gunadi / Jeffrey Lee6-4, 6-4
2025-10-11vs BC-Lakewood/TonyHsuWon 10
W#1 DoublesEric Smith / Andrew Radden vs David Kim / Jamie Wei7-5, 6-3
2025-10-04vs BC-Kramer/KevinEscobarWon 10
W#1 DoublesEric Smith / Tim Crawmer vs Brian Beach / Wade Murphy6-4, 6-2
2025-09-27vs BC-IndependencePark/RafaelHerreraLost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Brown / Andrew Radden vs Rafael Herrera / Renaldo Goncalves1-6, 3-6
2025-09-06vs BC-PVTC/ChadMacAllisterLost 01
L#2 DoublesTim Crawmer / Henry Coia vs Marcus Chang / Joshua Chou6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.62
Tim Crawmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.38
Mark Kresser
published
4.30
Andrew Radden
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Abe Wong
published 4.5
4.24
Henry Coia
published 4.5
4.24
Jason Manasse
published
4.17
Ross Wooldridge
published
4.16
David Niehaus
published 4.5
4.10
Nick Darrow
published
3.99
Steven Anderson
published
3.79
Tony Rojko
published
3.57
Matt Witherell
published
John Ziegler
published
Paul Kerwin
published
Remco Waller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Radden + Jason Manasse3343% games−7.6% vs expected
Andrew Radden + David Niehaus303 matchesnot enough data
Henry Coia + Steven Anderson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tim Crawmer
26W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
4.62
Mark Kresser
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
4.38
4.5
Andrew Radden
67W–56L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Abe Wong
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Henry Coia
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
Jason Manasse
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
Ross Wooldridge
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
David Niehaus
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.16
Nick Darrow
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.10
Steven Anderson
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.99
Tony Rojko
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.79
Matt Witherell
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
John Ziegler
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Kerwin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Remco Waller
35W–36L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.