Teams

GA 6.5M 40 & Over (Angland)

2025 Sequoyah Southern Combo 40 & Over - Summer · Men's 6.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-15vs MeshWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Smith / Robbie Armstrong vs Scott Higgins / David Locke1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEdward Jones / Brian Chastain vs Mark Williams / Brian Hammontree6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJames Angland / William Goostree vs Scott Sorrow / Mike Nance3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-03vs MeshWon 30
W#1 DoublesEdward Jones / Joshua Lawson vs Philip Schmidt / Billy Bowers3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWayne Harper / Brian Chastain vs Dwayne McGhee / Trent Farrer7-5, 1-3
W#3 DoublesJames Angland / Michael Hullender vs Mike Nance / David Locke6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-28vs MeshLost 12
W#1 DoublesRobert Hansen / William Goostree vs Philip Schmidt / Parmesh Venkatesu6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMark Berry / Robbie Armstrong vs Dwayne McGhee / Trent Farrer7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWayne Harper / Brian Chastain vs Scott Sorrow / David Locke2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-20vs MeshSplit 11
W#2 DoublesChris Smith / Brian Chastain vs Mark Williams / Brian Hammontree6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Hullender / Edward Jones vs Philip Schmidt / Trent Farrer3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Mark Berry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Robert Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Wayne Harper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
James Angland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Brian Chastain
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Robbie Armstrong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Joshua Lawson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Michael Hullender
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
William Goostree
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wayne Harper + James Angland3450% games+0.7% vs expected
Robert Hansen + Robbie Armstrong4253% games+0.4% vs expected
Mark Berry + Robert Hansen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Berry
28W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Robert Hansen
26W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Wayne Harper
14W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
James Angland
14W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Brian Chastain
39W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Robbie Armstrong
29W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.93
Joshua Lawson
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.92
Michael Hullender
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
William Goostree
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.