Teams

IE-APTC-Carter

2023 SoCal Fall Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-12-02vs IE-BC-BorresenWon 10
W#1 DoublesSkyla Carter / Kam Jara vs Kimberly Geske / Barbara Osland6-1, 6-2
2023-10-14vs IE-BC-BorresenWon 10
W#1 DoublesPingkham Rattanababpha / Kam Jara vs Jeanne Bender / Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty6-3, 6-4
2023-10-08vs IE-LLW-MTC Spin doctors-ShelterLost 01
L#1 DoublesPingkham Rattanababpha / Kam Jara vs Denise Radogna / Sandra Moya1-6, 1-6
2023-10-01vs IE-CL-HelbockLost 01
L#1 DoublesPingkham Rattanababpha / Kam Jara vs Jennifer Denson / Satoko Parsons7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Skyla Carter
published
3.13
Virginia Chang
published
3.04
2.81
Lydia Wong
published
2.76
2.69
Kam Jara
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Sheila Malone
published
Jacqueline Anderson
published
Monette Schwartz
published
Valoria Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kam Jara + Pingkham Rattanababpha6548% games+0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Skyla Carter
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.15
Virginia Chang
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.13
Veronica Johns-Richardson
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
Lydia Wong
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
0%1%99%
2.81
Pingkham Rattanababpha
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Kam Jara
69W–132L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Sheila Malone
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.62
Jacqueline Anderson
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Monette Schwartz
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Valoria Jones
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.