Teams

Estey 9.0 18+ W24

2024 Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 9.0 MX (FRI)

17 players · average NTRP 4.45 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-03-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesSam Hobbs / Isabella Lambert vs Anna Nguyen / Dat Truong6-3, 6-4
2024-02-16vs Humann 9.0 18+ W24Won 10
W#2 DoublesSam Hobbs / Aria Benjamin vs Christin Schumann / Douglas Matuska6-3, 6-3
2024-01-12vs Hanson/ MartinsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesSam Hobbs / Aria Benjamin vs Aaron Chung / Caroline Ward7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 MX (FRI) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.78
Isabella Lambert
published 5
4.67
Tommy Entwistle
published
4.41
Aria Benjamin
published 5
Abdugani Ganiev
published 4.5
Ankit Gupta
published 4.5
4.08
Brittany Alexander
published 4.5
4.05
Marti Estey
published
4.04
Cristina Kazda
published 4.5
4.03
Cecilia Grass-Neary
published 4.5
3.91
Neil Radermacher
published
3.90
Sam Hobbs
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.80
3.73
Andrea Boado
published 4
Klenton Willis
published
Kyle Hoffmann
published
Michael Mauthe
published
Mit Chareundy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Genevieve Swanson + Klenton Willis3346% gamesnot enough data
Klenton Willis + Aria Benjamin3350% gamesnot enough data
Isabella Lambert + Sam Hobbs224 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Hoffmann + Genevieve Swanson224 matchesnot enough data
Genevieve Swanson + Sam Hobbs404 matchesnot enough data
Michael Mauthe + Andrea Boado213 matchesnot enough data
Isabella Lambert + Klenton Willis213 matchesnot enough data
Sam Hobbs + Aria Benjamin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Isabella Lambert
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.78
Tommy Entwistle
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
4.67
5
Aria Benjamin
5W–17L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
4.41
4.5
Abdugani Ganiev
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Ankit Gupta
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Brittany Alexander
24W–28L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
4.08
Marti Estey
18W–29L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
4.05
4.5
Cristina Kazda
13W–20L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
4.04
4.5
Cecilia Grass-Neary
12W–26L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
4.03
Neil Radermacher
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
3.91
4
Sam Hobbs
249W–170L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Genevieve Swanson
59W–66L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Andrea Boado
60W–43L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Klenton Willis
18W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kyle Hoffmann
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Mauthe
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mit Chareundy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.