Teams

Bonnett/18/DIII/TM/CP

2026 NO Tri Level 18 & Over - Men · 4.5,4.0,3.5 NO (18&O) Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.79 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-08-10vs Goings/18/DIII/TM/CPLost 02
L#1 DoublesEric Landry / Steven Alcala vs William Loupe / Todd Lacoste6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesChad Sotolongo / Andrew Fuselier vs Bert Miller / Isaac Mudge2-6, 1-6
2026-08-05vs Westholz/18/DIII/TM/CPLost 02
L#2 DoublesJulian Richards / Chad Sotolongo vs Ian Dolese / Damon Wang3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Fabacher / Bryan Parks vs Kyle Gross / Joshua Thomas6-7, 4-6
2026-08-03vs Bonnet/18/DIII/TM/CPLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Raff / Felix Rioja vs David Stahl / Hunter Whealdon6-7, 0-6
2026-07-30vs Conatser/18/DIII/TM/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesFelix Rioja / Brennan Okeefe vs Robert Schenck / Taylor Smith1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLee Blosser / Andrew Fuselier vs Eric Dumonteil / Yeon Lee3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Fabacher / Bryan Parks vs Richard Barfield / Erich Weishaupt2-6, 1-6
2026-07-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesYeon Lee / Felix Rioja vs Martin Padial / Eric Landry4-6, 1-6
2026-07-16vs Bonnet/18/DIII/TM/CPWon 21
W#1 DoublesAshley Abbott / Brennan Okeefe vs Anthony MacAluso / Mark Broussard6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKyle Bonnett / Chad Sotolongo vs Ian Sigl / Greg Dadlez2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBryan Parks / Jeffrey Fabacher vs David Beach Jr / Jared Zeller4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-06-30vs Goings/18/DIII/TM/CPLost 12
W#1 DoublesLee Blosser / Brennan Okeefe vs Christian Cannon / Todd Lacoste6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEric Landry / John Rabon vs Martin Padial / Colin Meyer6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChad Sotolongo / Andrew Fuselier vs Christian Generes / Christopher Wilson2-6, 3-6
2026-06-25vs Westholz/18/DIII/TM/CPWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteven Alcala / Lee Blosser vs Andrew Westholz / Lee Kyle4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrennan Okeefe / John Rabon vs Damon Wang / Scott Fusco7-5, 6-3
2026-06-11vs Zimmer/18/DII/TM/CPWon 10
W#1 DoublesFelix Rioja / Pat Neely vs Hunter Whealdon / Damon Wang7-5, 6-2
2026-06-05vs Westholz/18/DIII/TM/CPLost 01
L#1 DoublesYeon Lee / Felix Rioja vs Eric Landry / Andrew Westholz3-6, 1-6
2026-06-04vs Bonnet/18/DIII/TM/CPLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Santa Lucia / Steven Alcala vs Eli Gay / Anthony MacAluso6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAshley Abbott / Chad Sotolongo vs Ian Sigl / Matthew Bolton7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Fabacher / Kyle Bonnett vs Greg Dadlez / Jared Zeller7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-29vs Conatser/18/DIII/TM/CPLost 12
W#1 DoublesLee Blosser / Steven Alcala vs Taylor Smith / Robert Schenck7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrennan Okeefe / Julian Richards vs Vincent Asaro / Eric Dumonteil1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChad Sotolongo / Andrew Fuselier vs Erich Weishaupt / Richard Barfield6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5,4.0,3.5 NO (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Steven Alcala
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Lee Blosser
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.92
Eric Landry
published 4
3.88
Ashley Abbott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Felix Rioja
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Brennan Okeefe
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
John Rabon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Bryan Parks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Chad Sotolongo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Jeffrey Fabacher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Andrew Fuselier
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Julian Richards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Bonnett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Santa Lucia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Sotolongo + Andrew Fuselier31237% games−3.7% vs expected
Chad Sotolongo + Kyle Bonnett31241% games−7.1% vs expected
Bryan Parks + Jeffrey Fabacher123 matchesnot enough data
Felix Rioja + Jeffrey Fabacher033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steven Alcala
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.22
Lee Blosser
19W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Eric Landry
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Ashley Abbott
19W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Felix Rioja
7W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Brennan Okeefe
3W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.53
John Rabon
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Bryan Parks
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Chad Sotolongo
8W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.36
Jeffrey Fabacher
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Andrew Fuselier
7W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.14
Julian Richards
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kyle Bonnett
4W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Santa Lucia
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.