Teams

Alberta Banks-West/Cialella-Smith

2024 · 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

15 players · average NTRP 3.12 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-04Won 10
W#4 DoublesRosemarie Long / Rhonda Anderson vs Darcey Latzsch / Cindy Reed7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Connie-Sue Oriel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Diana Stout
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.03
Karen Potts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Cheryl Stone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Debbie Wiley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.99
Tricia Sexton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.96
Mary Cialella-Smith
published
2.91
Sue Mayfield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Rhonda Beck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Mary Ann West
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Stewart Mary Jo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Michele Gregory
published
2.72
Rosemarie Long
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Jan Myers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rhonda Anderson
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Ann West + Cheryl Stone6362% games+2.1% vs expected
Connie-Sue Oriel + Stewart Mary Jo3741% games−2.3% vs expected
Diana Stout + Debbie Wiley7064% gamesnot enough data
Stewart Mary Jo + Michele Gregory3253% gamesnot enough data
Diana Stout + Stewart Mary Jo314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Potts + Michele Gregory314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Potts + Jan Myers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Connie-Sue Oriel
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Diana Stout
27W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.08
Karen Potts
36W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Cheryl Stone
24W–10L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Debbie Wiley
16W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Tricia Sexton
17W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Mary Cialella-Smith
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Sue Mayfield
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Rhonda Beck
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
Mary Ann West
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Stewart Mary Jo
29W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Michele Gregory
67W–42L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Rosemarie Long
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Jan Myers
31W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rhonda Anderson
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.