Teams

Adams-DCTRC

2024 Mixed 40 & Over-DLT · 3.5 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-11vs Tackett-Twin RiversWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Ashford / Susan Adams vs Michael Maloney / Hattie Frank-Bourne6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesFloyd Trammell / Melissa Hazlewood vs Randy Tackett / Shawna Young7-5, 6-4
2024-07-10vs Tackett-Twin RiversWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicolas Quintana Ashwell / Tracy Etheridge vs Tim Tyler / Lizzie Powers6-4, 6-1
2024-06-20vs Tackett-Twin RiversSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPaul Ashford / Robin Toler vs Michael Maloney / Hattie Frank-Bourne6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesFloyd Trammell / Diane Chenault vs Tim Tyler / Lizzie Powers4-6, 1-6
2024-06-13vs Tackett-Twin RiversWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Ashford / Susan Adams vs Tim Tyler / Andrea Kirk4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeremy Foster / Tracy Etheridge vs Philip Hardy / Renae Hardy6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesFloyd Trammell / Robin Toler vs Paul Lyon / Lizzie Powers6-3, 6-2
2024-06-06vs Tackett-Twin RiversWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Adams / Paul Ashford vs Paul Lyon / Shawna Young6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJeremy Foster / Tracy Etheridge vs Michael Maloney / Hattie Frank-Bourne6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesWilliam Smith / Robin Toler vs Randy Tackett / Andrea Kirk6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Adams-DCTRC50141591
2Tackett-Twin Rivers0511428174

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Nicolas Quintana Ashwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Robin Toler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Jeremy Foster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Melissa Hazlewood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Tracy Etheridge
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Diane Chenault
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Floyd Trammell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Paul Ashford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Floyd Trammell + Tracy Etheridge123 matchesnot enough data
Diane Chenault + Paul Ashford123 matchesnot enough data
Jeremy Foster + Tracy Etheridge303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicolas Quintana Ashwell
33W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61
Robin Toler
64W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
Jeremy Foster
29W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Melissa Hazlewood
67W–27L career · 1 line in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
Tracy Etheridge
64W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Diane Chenault
42W–54L career · 1 line in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Floyd Trammell
4W–10L career · type M · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul Ashford
18W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.