Teams

Churchey/Memphis

2026 Adult 65 & Over - Memphis · 3.5 Adult 65 & Over Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-26vs Nobles/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesJackie Renner Mills / Roz Wallace vs Nan Gallina / Joanne Sandefer2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Hauber / Luisa Pagliarulo vs Lori Fairless / Dana Holland-Beickert2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Churchey / Debbie Bryant vs Plum Nobles / Catherine Eddy3-6, 5-7
2026-07-12vs Bienstock/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDebbie Bryant / Harriet Dodd vs Andrea Bienstock / Andrea Pressley6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRoz Wallace / Tricia Bergeron vs Mary Sutton / Carol Himmelstein6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-28vs Nobles/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesJackie Renner Mills / Harriet Dodd vs Beverly Finnell / Plum Nobles2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLuisa Pagliarulo / Debbie Bryant vs Sun Hui Wright / Catherine Eddy0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Churchey / Roz Wallace vs Joanne Sandefer / Nan Gallina3-6, 2-6
2026-06-14vs Bienstock/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Umsted / Debbie Bryant vs Connie Lester / Michelle McCarty6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRoz Wallace / Harriet Dodd vs Andrea Bienstock / Andrea Pressley3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPamela Hauber / Luisa Pagliarulo vs Mary Sutton / Monika Wierdl6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-07vs Nobles/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Churchey / Tricia Bergeron vs Sun Hui Wright / Joanne Sandefer1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Umsted / Jackie Renner Mills vs Plum Nobles / Dawn Ton1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLuisa Pagliarulo / Roz Wallace vs Deborah Kershner / Dana Holland-Beickert1-6, 1-6
2026-05-17vs Bienstock/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesPamela Hauber / Tricia Bergeron vs Kimberly MacQueen / Carol Himmelstein1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJackie Renner Mills / Mary Umsted vs Andrea Bienstock / Connie Lester3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDebbie Churchey / Debbie Bryant vs Mary Sutton / Barby Patterson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 65 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Luisa Pagliarulo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Debbie Churchey
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
Harriet Dodd
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Mary Umsted
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Pamela Hauber
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Roz Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.76
Tricia Bergeron
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Jackie Renner Mills
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Janet Leap
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Churchey + Tricia Bergeron1438% games+1.7% vs expected
Tricia Bergeron + Pamela Hauber224 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Bergeron + Harriet Dodd303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luisa Pagliarulo
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Debbie Churchey
59W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Harriet Dodd
49W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Mary Umsted
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.91
Pamela Hauber
25W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Roz Wallace
23W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Tricia Bergeron
30W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Jackie Renner Mills
7W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
Janet Leap
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.