Teams

OKWC2/Johnson/55&Over6.0W

2025 TUL ADULT 55 & Over League · 6.0 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-12vs Killingsworth/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesHaven Willis / Laura Vidal vs Tricia Riggs / Carol Conrad6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBeverly Colson / Linda Peterson vs Amie Berenger / Noreen Peters2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCorinne Johnson / Sandy Hightower vs Henri Sabin / Kathy Alexander6-1, 6-1
2025-05-11vs Page/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesCorinne Johnson / Sandy Hightower vs Karen Santee / Pam Bohanon6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHaven Willis / Linda Peterson vs Jeanna Holcomb / Joan Gausvik7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJanice Wilburn / Laura Vidal vs Jamie Sawyer / Zeanna Long6-3, 6-4
2025-03-29vs OK/Elias/55&over6.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandy Hightower / Corinne Johnson vs Blythe Fowler / Tracie Pelotte6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBeverly Colson / Linda Peterson vs Bobbie Carpenter / Vicki Smith6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesHaven Willis / Laura Vidal vs Leigh Roy / Divina Roman6-3, 6-2
2025-03-22vs Park 55/ISWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandy Hightower / Corinne Johnson vs Sheila Cooper / Monica Fincher6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLee Ray / Janice Wilburn vs Debbie Crowley / Marcell Matthews2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesHaven Willis / Laura Vidal vs Kay Gulledge / Barb Evans6-0, 6-1
2025-03-01vs Killingsworth/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandy Hightower / Linda Peterson vs Amie Berenger / Noreen Peters2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHaven Willis / Corinne Johnson vs Debbie Killingsworth / Margot Heyne-Bell6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJanice Wilburn / Michelle Carabello vs Brenda Lewis / Tricia Riggs4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Corinne Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Michelle Carabello
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Haven Willis
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.01
Sandy Hightower
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.96
Laura Vidal
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Linda Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Lee Ray
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Beverly Colson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Janice Wilburn
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Carabello + Sandy Hightower6162% games+10.2% vs expected
Corinne Johnson + Laura Vidal12563% games+7.7% vs expected
Haven Willis + Laura Vidal6163% games+5.3% vs expected
Corinne Johnson + Janice Wilburn4642% games+2.6% vs expected
Beverly Colson + Corinne Johnson13554% games+0.8% vs expected
Corinne Johnson + Sandy Hightower7560% games−2.8% vs expected
Janice Wilburn + Linda Peterson4352% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Hightower + Laura Vidal3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Corinne Johnson
132W–93L career · 9 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Michelle Carabello
32W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Haven Willis
206W–111L career · 10 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.02
Sandy Hightower
140W–115L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Laura Vidal
112W–58L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Linda Peterson
85W–87L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
Lee Ray
36W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Beverly Colson
55W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.70
Janice Wilburn
45W–105L career · 7 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.