Teams

UPTA55/Fuller/Sportsclub

2023 UPTA Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55+ Adult Women - 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-12vs UPTA55/Siegel/GTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesVickie Fuller / Julie Branham vs Cynthia Church / Jinny Jervey6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2023-04-05vs UPTA55/McPhail/RiversideLost 01
L#2 DoublesVickie Fuller / Tina Underwood vs Peggy O'Reagan / Liz Darrow3-6, 0-6
2023-03-29vs UPTA55/Dresden/KrocLost 01
L#1 DoublesVickie Fuller / Tina Underwood vs Patricia Carek / Elizabeth McDonough2-6, 5-7
2023-03-08vs UPTA55/Koban/Spindle TreeWon 10
W#1 DoublesVickie Fuller / Yuriko Centa vs Laura Karns / Cynthia Forbes6-2, 6-4
2023-02-22vs UPTA55/Dodwell/BrookstoneLost 01
L#2 DoublesVickie Fuller / Julie Branham vs Mary Jordan / Annette Curin2-6, 3-6
2023-02-15vs UPTA55/Fountain/Keowee KeyLost 01
L#1 DoublesVickie Fuller / Donna Parrett vs Aimee Fountain / Sandra Franklin3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55+ Adult Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Janet Matricciani
published
3.23
Yuriko Centa
published
3.20
Julie Branham
published
3.14
Lisa Mlady
published
3.02
Tina Underwood
published
2.83
Hilde Sparovic
published
2.82
Donna Parrett
published
2.78
2.73
Vickie Fuller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Mlady + Tina Underwood4443% games+1.4% vs expected
Donna Parrett + Tina Underwood3252% gamesnot enough data
Donna Parrett + Betty Ann Stinchcomb213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Matricciani
27W–33L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.59
Yuriko Centa
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
3.23
Julie Branham
49W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%8%92%
3.20
Lisa Mlady
31W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.14
Tina Underwood
43W–41L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
Hilde Sparovic
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Donna Parrett
12W–25L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Betty Ann Stinchcomb
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Vickie Fuller
17W–59L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.