Teams

BAIN-Fitzgerald

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-13vs NWW-NTC-TuckerLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Alaniz / Ann Knight vs Rosemary Curran / Kathy Trumbauer3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEdith Cobourn / Eileen Nicol vs Telsin Brower / Lesley Burvill Holmes1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Fitzgerald / Kathleen Dassel vs Donna Lou / Virginia Nordberg2-6, 2-6
2025-06-04vs NWW-FC-PinkertonLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Knight / Irva Cooper vs Homa Assefi / Sherrill Stone2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKim Fox / Kathryn Nance vs Jenny Pinkerton / Lori Nelson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Oblak / Edith Cobourn vs Paulette Caplener / Ellen Ramsey3-6, 2-6
2025-06-02vs CP-ShotSisters-EssingerLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Fox / Irva Cooper vs Susanna Wilken / Lili Chang1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJane Hobden / Susan Phillips vs Lynn Vona / Lynda Carlson0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Fitzgerald / Kathleen Dassel vs Karen Stalker / Priscilla Kloess0-6, 1-6
2025-05-28vs HBSQ-TierneyLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Fox / Shannon Fitzgerald vs Darla Schlumberger / Colleen Tracy0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJane Hobden / Kathryn Nance vs Cory Jacobson / Patricia Liner0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLoanne Harmeling / Susan Phillips vs Bethlyn Whitney / Joyce Tierney0-6, 0-6
2025-05-21vs BTA-HoweWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnn Knight / Kim Fox vs Debra Simmonds / Maren Gibson6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Phillips / Jane Hobden vs Roseshel Howe / Holly Conley6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesIrva Cooper / Princie Falkenhagen vs Nancy Edwards / Corinne Walsh6-3, 6-3
2025-05-14vs HBSQ-YeighWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Knight / Irva Cooper vs Debra Alanis / Michell Marx7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Phillips / Kathryn Nance vs Margaret Anaya / Jill Snyder6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEdith Cobourn / Linda Jenning vs Francoise O'Donnell / Jeanette Brandal6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-05-09vs BETC-IkedaLost 03
L#1 DoublesEileen Nicol / Linda Jenning vs Linda Blegen / Debbie Donovan0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPrincie Falkenhagen / Irva Cooper vs Lauri Iwasaki / Patricia Allen3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Wolfe / Shannon Fitzgerald vs Diane Weiser / Joan Edwards5-7, 0-6
2025-04-30vs BETC-HughesLost 03
L#1 DoublesPrincie Falkenhagen / Kathleen Dassel vs Ming Vuong / Ruthann Nelson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEileen Nicol / Susan Oblak vs Ann Goodenberger / Sally Linebarger2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Jenning / Edith Cobourn vs Terry Holtgraves / Lila Hughes4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 6.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWW-FC-Pinkerton7118616179
2NWW-NTC-Tucker7116818179
3BETC-Ikeda6216822190
4HBSQ-Tierney53121227213
5BTA-Howe35141024214
6BETC-Hughes35111328212
7HBSQ-Yeigh2681634246
8BAIN-Fitzgerald2651940267
9CP-ShotSisters-Essinger1781635248

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ann Knight
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Deborah Wolfe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Berit Bergquist
published 3
2.65
Elizabeth Alaniz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Irva Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
1.99
Kathleen Dassel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.95
Shannon Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Edith Cobourn
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Eileen Nicol
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jane Hobden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kathryn Nance
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Fox
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Linda Jenning
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Loanne Harmeling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Princie Falkenhagen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Oblak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Knight + Kim Fox134 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Dassel + Shannon Fitzgerald033 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Alaniz + Berit Bergquist033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann Knight
5W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Deborah Wolfe
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Berit Bergquist
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Elizabeth Alaniz
17W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Irva Cooper
59W–50L career · 5 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
Kathleen Dassel
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Shannon Fitzgerald
11W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Edith Cobourn
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Eileen Nicol
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane Hobden
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathryn Nance
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Fox
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Jenning
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Loanne Harmeling
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Princie Falkenhagen
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Oblak
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Phillips
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.