Teams

Spencer - RS Clay

2023 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2023-10-12vs O'Neill - PCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesWill Spencer / Robert Fabbro vs David Bushing / Charlie Culpepper2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-09-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesWill Spencer / Robert Fabbro vs Noel Pacheco / Chris Shaffer7-5, 6-1
2023-09-26vs Farkas - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesWill Spencer / Robert Fabbro vs Kenneth Wallace / Hassan Al-Ansari6-1, 6-0
2023-09-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesWill Spencer / Robert Fabbro vs Glenn Langan / Kirk Bradley6-3, 6-2
2023-09-20vs O'Neill - PCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesWill Spencer / Robert Fabbro vs Brett Snyder / David Bushing3-6, 2-6
2023-09-19vs O'Neill - PCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesWill Spencer / Robert Fabbro vs Jase Graves / Charlie Culpepper6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWill Spencer / Robert Fabbro vs Anthony Bonjorno / George Rials0-6, 4-6
2023-09-05vs Farkas - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesWill Spencer / Robert Fabbro vs Nick Farkas / David Stafford6-3, 6-2
2023-08-31vs A. Moore - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesWill Spencer / Robert Fabbro vs Troy Gill / Kirk Bradley6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesWill Spencer / Robert Fabbro vs Josh Sitton / George Rials3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-17vs Farkas - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesWill Spencer / Robert Fabbro vs Scott Peck / Nick Farkas6-1, 7-6
2023-08-15vs Farkas - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesWill Spencer / Robert Fabbro vs Hassan Al-Ansari / Nick Farkas6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Will Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published
3.80
Robert Fabbro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Samuel Wallace
published
3.66
Lockland Tyler
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
3.58
Kirk Bradley
published
3.38
James Craft
published
3.29
Craig Abel
published 3.5
3.26
Chase Dupuis
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Will Spencer + Robert Fabbro231656% games−1.9% vs expected
Lockland Tyler + Kirk Bradley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Will Spencer
121W–56L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
Robert Fabbro
143W–78L career · 18 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
Samuel Wallace
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
Lockland Tyler
47W–37L career · 11 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Kirk Bradley
3W–18L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.58
James Craft
19W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Craig Abel
19W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Chase Dupuis
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.