Teams

CBRC-Allen

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 WOMEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-23vs EW-WCCP-SteinerLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Queen / Diane Molleson vs Sandee Andrews / Voni Tombari1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLory Allen / Judi Harris vs Pamela Farley / Marian Menke6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAnne Sampson / Marjean Bleazard vs Muriel Blevins / Cindy Fenick1-6, 1-6
2022-10-22vs EW-WRAC-Bowen-LorrainLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Lee Pickett / Judi Harris vs Kathleen McIver / Joyce Flyckt4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLory Allen / Kathy Queen vs Beata Miller / Lisa Watkins2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Molleson / Anne Sampson vs Selena Hernandez / Kathy Dinwiddie2-6, 6-7
2022-10-22vs PC-Peach PreservesLost 03
L#1 DoublesVaLois Hymas / Kathy Queen vs Kathy Walker / Julie Hart2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Lee Pickett / Judi Harris vs Nancy Lauck / Deborah Wall5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarjean Bleazard / Anne Sampson vs Terri Welsh / ARLENE CUSTER6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-10-21vs WCCP-Boinski/DahmLost 12
W#1 DoublesVaLois Hymas / Kathy Queen vs Diane Tunnell / Judy Chessar6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLory Allen / Mary Lee Pickett vs Teri Alexander / Stephanie Butler3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarjean Bleazard / Diane Molleson vs Terri Dahm / Susan Boinski4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Diane Molleson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Judi Harris
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Lory Allen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Anne Sampson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Queen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
VaLois Hymas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

VaLois Hymas + Lory Allen044 matchesnot enough data
VaLois Hymas + Kathy Queen134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diane Molleson
2W–27L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Judi Harris
65W–88L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Lory Allen
23W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
Anne Sampson
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Queen
3W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
VaLois Hymas
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.