Teams

LOS GATOS SR 40MX6.0B

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX6.0

18 players · average NTRP 2.86 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#1 DoublesMichele Stefan / Steve Han vs Anton Andreev / Marina Khitrov7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSharon Elder / James Elder vs Frederick Raniel / Maryam Sanaei0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Alexandra Koseva
published 3
Ashley Pass
published 3
2.74
Gary Serbent
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Sharon Elder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Amanda Studer
published 3
2.68
Badis Ben Hamida
published 3
2.54
Michele Stefan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Ram Ranganathan
published
2.50
Aviva Garrett
published 3
2.48
Subhendra Ghosh
published
2.46
Traci Armstrong
published
2.44
Viktor Sokolenko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Gytis Barzdukas
published
2.29
Christine Tai
published 2.5
2.25
Nancy Hembree
published
2.04
Andrea Peifer
published 2.5
James Elder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Stefan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Badis Ben Hamida + Alexandra Koseva213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexandra Koseva
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Ashley Pass
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gary Serbent
9W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Sharon Elder
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Amanda Studer
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Badis Ben Hamida
5W–16L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Michele Stefan
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%40%60%
2.54
Ram Ranganathan
0W–16L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
3
Aviva Garrett
6W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Subhendra Ghosh
0W–11L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Traci Armstrong
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%62%38%
2.46
Viktor Sokolenko
1W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Gytis Barzdukas
1W–17L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.37
2.5
Christine Tai
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
Nancy Hembree
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Andrea Peifer
2W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
James Elder
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mark Stefan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.