Teams

KY/LOU/RECHTER/WARREN

2022 USTA COMBO 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

21 players · average NTRP 3.38 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Lauren Whitsell
published
3.93
Cara Robinson
published 4
3.57
Laura Gaviglio
published
3.56
Rebekkah Rechter
published
3.53
Lindsey Wegley
published
3.47
3.38
Ciara Warren
published 3.5
3.33
Vongmany Edmonds
published
3.29
Susan Stack
published
3.27
Tamara McCormick
published
3.20
Jennie Barker
published
3.20
Carolyn Wilmes
published 3.5
3.14
Patricia Wortley
published
3.11
Aubrey Mojesky
published 3.5
3.07
Abbie Leffert
published 3.5
2.93
Deanna Gordinier
published 3
2.77
Erica LaFever
published 3
2.75
Betsy Brill
published 3
2.75
Michea Dicken
published
Tracy Karam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Pittenger Rapp + Rebekkah Rechter4252% games+11.1% vs expected
Jennie Barker + Susan Stack4347% games+1.8% vs expected
Tamara McCormick + Vongmany Edmonds6354% games−0.1% vs expected
Jennifer Pittenger Rapp + Susan Stack2445% games−1.0% vs expected
Jennifer Pittenger Rapp + Vongmany Edmonds2345% games−1.5% vs expected
Jennie Barker + Abbie Leffert3443% games−2.5% vs expected
Patricia Wortley + Jennie Barker4353% games−2.8% vs expected
Tamara McCormick + Jennie Barker4167% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Whitsell
58W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Cara Robinson
60W–38L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.93
Laura Gaviglio
50W–40L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.57
Rebekkah Rechter
39W–53L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.56
Lindsey Wegley
40W–8L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
Jennifer Pittenger Rapp
23W–36L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Ciara Warren
48W–40L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
Vongmany Edmonds
69W–56L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Susan Stack
22W–27L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.29
Tamara McCormick
55W–39L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Jennie Barker
36W–26L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Carolyn Wilmes
19W–25L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
Patricia Wortley
29W–47L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Aubrey Mojesky
14W–25L career · no lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Abbie Leffert
21W–33L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Deanna Gordinier
35W–64L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Erica LaFever
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Betsy Brill
12W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Michelle Schneidtmiller
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Michea Dicken
20W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracy Karam
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.