Teams

Fast and Furious

2024 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 4.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.33 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-09-30vs Net ResultsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEboni Lance vs Rachel Mingus6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesFelicia Harrison vs Christine Becer4-6, 0-6
2024-09-28vs Ball too WellLost 12
L#1 SinglesAnne Jagodits vs Ana Maria Pena Castro3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesEboni Lance vs Elissa Lei2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesFelicia Harrison vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-22vs Net ResultsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesEboni Lance vs Hannah Stahl6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAnne Jagodits vs Michele Campbell6-0, 6-2
2024-09-20vs Ball too WellWon 10
W#1 SinglesAnne Jagodits vs Elissa Lei6-1, 6-2
2024-09-11vs Net ResultsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnne Jagodits vs Helen Shepherd4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesEboni Lance vs Clare Donahue6-1, 6-3
2024-08-16vs Ball too WellWon 10
W#1 SinglesFelicia Harrison vs Elissa Lei6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2024-08-02vs Net ResultsLost 01
L#1 SinglesFelicia Harrison vs Rachel Mingus2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-07-16vs Net ResultsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesFelicia Harrison vs Tara Jakubik0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAnne Jagodits vs Clare Donahue6-2, 6-3
2024-07-12vs Ball too WellLost 01
L#1 SinglesAnne Jagodits vs Ana Maria Pena Castro1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Eboni Lance
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.23
Anne Jagodits
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.03
Stacy Stratton
published
3.86
Felicia Harrison
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 4
3.67
Kathy Crowley
published
Kristin Quackenbush
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Jagodits + Felicia Harrison123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eboni Lance
355W–213L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
4.38
4.5
Anne Jagodits
208W–213L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Stacy Stratton
8W–17L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Felicia Harrison
87W–105L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.86
Kathy Crowley
15W–34L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Kristin Quackenbush
20W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.