Teams

Nicholson/Smith 18+

2025 USTA League Adult 18 & Over - Fall 2024- HSV · 3.5 MEN 18N2S3D

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-22vs Haselden Fall 3.5 18+Lost 13
W#1 DoublesEvan Brannen / Timothy Harrigan vs Brian Lee / Vik Saini6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAlpesh Patel vs Michael Smith4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Teal / Samuel Knight vs Christopher Chapman / Richard Textor3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesNoah Patterson vs Christian Deutsch6-7, 4-6
2024-11-05vs Land Fall 3.5Split 22
W#1 DoublesChris Smith / Evan Brannen vs Neil Matson / Conner Bell1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRichard Nash vs Evan Hildner1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Garside / Timothy Harrigan vs Brent Land / Drew Humphrey4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMichael Nicholson / Zachary Barnett vs Jared Lawrence / Troy Butler7-6, 7-6
2024-10-22vs Haselden Fall 3.5 18+Lost 23
L#1 DoublesNoah Patterson / Zachary Barnett vs Jeremy Pope / Brian Lee1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAlpesh Patel vs Michael Smith1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKyle Wright / Timothy Harrigan vs Christian Deutsch / Michael Renfro7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAndrew Teal vs Gary Stephens6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJared Staman / Samuel Knight vs Stephen Hall / Vik Saini5-7, 4-6
2024-10-05vs Land Fall 3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Smith / Matthew Garside vs Drew Humphrey / Neil Matson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Nicholson / Andrew Teal vs Conner Bell / Barrett Wright3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Weissgerber / Samuel Knight vs Erik Mayhan / Justin Burton2-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN 18N2S3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Trent Rich
published
3.42
Andrew Teal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Timothy Harrigan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Zachary Barnett
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.30
Evan Brannen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
John Weissgerber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Jared Staman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Noah Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.12
Samuel Knight
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Alpesh Patel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.96
Michael Nicholson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Matthew Garside
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Richard Nash
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Todd Harrison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Teal + Evan Brannen303 matchesnot enough data
Evan Brannen + Samuel Knight123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trent Rich
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Andrew Teal
48W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Timothy Harrigan
36W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
Zachary Barnett
36W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Evan Brannen
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
John Weissgerber
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.20
Jared Staman
28W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Noah Patterson
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Samuel Knight
25W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Alpesh Patel
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Michael Nicholson
33W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Matthew Garside
23W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.88
Richard Nash
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Todd Harrison
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.