Teams

GEPTA-6.0-MX-18(Lunghi)(EPTC#1)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 3.06 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings6 teams · 2024 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Cisneros/18&overMX/6.09121919184
2GEPTA-6.0-MX-18(Lunghi)(EPTC#1)82181227245
3GEPTA-6.0-MX-18(Saul)(FB)55151533254
4GEPTA-6.0-MX-18(Navedo)(EPTC#2)46141637272
5GEPTA-6.0-MX-18(Mirazo)(EPCC)37121839293
6GEPTA-6.0-MX-18(Wilcox)(TW)19102047317

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Arvind Singhal
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published 3.5
2.99
Gloria King
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 34% · published 3
2.87
Diane Lunghi
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.84
Esther Orona
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Dennis Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.80
James Lambeth
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.68
James McCleland
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Cristina da Costa
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3
Jennifer Bush
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Nelly Jallad
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published
Pat Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Patricia Moye Holderman
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stephanie Beckles
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Steven King
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Bush + Diane Lunghi151057% games+3.9% vs expected
Esther Orona + Diane Lunghi391958% games+3.6% vs expected
Esther Orona + Gloria King11753% gamesnot enough data
Esther Orona + Stephanie Beckles8456% gamesnot enough data
Diane Lunghi + Gloria King10266% gamesnot enough data
Cristina da Costa + Patricia Moye Holderman6456% gamesnot enough data
Esther Orona + Patricia Moye Holderman6362% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Moye Holderman + Gloria King6352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Arvind Singhal
57W–55L career · 37 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Gloria King
100W–61L career · 32 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Diane Lunghi
136W–94L career · 26 lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Esther Orona
115W–106L career · 31 lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Dennis Rodriguez
45W–57L career · 45 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
3
James Lambeth
108W–107L career · 67 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
3
James McCleland
80W–75L career · 36 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Cristina da Costa
67W–92L career · 26 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
Jennifer Bush
67W–81L career · 20 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nelly Jallad
28W–37L career · 17 lines in 2024
not enough data
Pat Rodriguez
41W–59L career · 23 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Moye Holderman
66W–54L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Beckles
71W–60L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven King
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.