Teams

JCramerNHC

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-06vs IDMICHAUDLost 01
L#3 DoublesMaryvann Roberson / Sarah Overholser vs Aparna Vanguri / Christy Sandy3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-22vs DDriscollSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSarah Overholser / Julie Rizzo vs Keri Urwin / Pamela Spell4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLee Anne Oxford / Maryvann Roberson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-15vs MCurryWon 10
W#1 DoublesLee Anne Oxford / Dana Aderhold vs Melissa House / Mary Hellner6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-14vs KBarsnessLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlison Bernhardt / Caroline Monson vs Julie Fleming / Katherine Seawell-Lewis0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Overholser / Lee Anne Oxford vs Jennifer Brock / Lisa Kempf2-6, 3-6
2022-09-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlison Bernhardt / Lee Anne Oxford vs Catherine Chavez / Amy Ellis6-2, 6-0
2022-09-01vs KRuggieri/WellsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Rizzo / Alison Bernhardt vs Laura Brown / Joanne Butler2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLee Anne Oxford / Inma Navarro Galisteo vs Jennifer Markham / Mary Grace Marlow2-6, 4-6
2022-08-25vs EWaltonWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlison Bernhardt / Dana Aderhold vs Erica Walton / Susan Haughney6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJulie Rizzo / Sarah Overholser vs Kelly Sutton / Beth Robertson6-3, 6-1
2022-08-18vs JBrownLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlison Bernhardt / Jill Cramer vs Lena Gott / Lisa Sun2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Sarah Overholser
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Lee Anne Oxford
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.02
Alison Bernhardt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.94
2.84
Dana Aderhold
published 3
2.80
Katie Wellman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Inma Navarro Galisteo + Lee Anne Oxford5073% games+12.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sarah Overholser
123W–66L career · 4 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Lee Anne Oxford
83W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.07
3.5
Alison Bernhardt
57W–97L career · 5 lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
3.02
3
Inma Navarro Galisteo
17W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Dana Aderhold
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
Katie Wellman
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.