Teams

Robinson/Chattanooga

2025 Adult 40 & Over-Chattanooga · 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-03vs Joyce/ChattanoogaLost 14
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kueter / Anne Bradshaw vs Felice Hadden / Laurie Brown7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJenni Johnson vs Laura Ketcham2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMcKellar Newsom / Donna Coleman vs Emily Donohue Speer / Courtney Brunetz6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChari Buckner / Alison Robinson vs Stacy Sorrow / Kennisha Cann4-6, 4-0
L#4 DoublesLorraine Marks / Coleen Davis vs Beverly Geismar / Joni Wolfe3-6, 4-6
2025-04-27vs Joyce/ChattanoogaWon 41
W#1 DoublesDonna Coleman / Coleen Davis vs Laurie Brown / Felice Hadden4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Kueter vs Emily Donohue Speer6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRoxie Trovato / Jenni Johnson vs Stacy Sorrow / Joni Wolfe6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCourtney Andreach / Lara Poulos vs Kennisha Cann / Laura Ketcham7-5, 6-4
L#4 DoublesLisa Heltzel / Susan Crum vs Carmon Hipp / Beverly Geismar1-6, 3-6
2025-04-12vs Joyce/ChattanoogaLost 23
W#1 DoublesMcKellar Newsom / Donna Coleman vs Jill Joyce / Kennisha Cann6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLisa Heltzel vs Courtney Brunetz0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRegina Hickl-Szabo / Lorraine Marks vs Stacy Sorrow / Julie Briggs2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRoxie Trovato / Alison Robinson vs Emily Donohue Speer / Beverly Geismar4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesChari Buckner / Lara Poulos vs Carmon Hipp / Felice Hadden4-6, 5-7
2025-04-06vs Joyce/ChattanoogaWon 32
W#1 DoublesMcKellar Newsom / Donna Coleman vs Lawanna Chang / Beverly Geismar7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Kueter vs Joni Wolfe7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRoxie Trovato / Jenni Johnson vs Jill Joyce / Laurie Brown7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Crum / Courtney Andreach vs Carmon Hipp / Felice Hadden4-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesAlison Robinson / Lisa Heltzel vs Laura Ketcham / Stacy Sorrow2-6, 1-6
2025-03-30vs Joyce/ChattanoogaLost 14
L#1 DoublesRoxie Trovato / Chari Buckner vs Julie Briggs / Joni Wolfe4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLara Poulos vs Laura Ketcham1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Kueter / Anne Bradshaw vs Jill Joyce / Courtney Brunetz7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRegina Hickl-Szabo / Susan Crum vs Carmon Hipp / Emily Donohue Speer5-7, 2-6
L#4 DoublesLisa Heltzel / Courtney Andreach vs Lawanna Chang / Felice Hadden1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Roxie Trovato
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Alison Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 4
Chari Buckner
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 4
Coleen Davis
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Donna Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.55
Courtney Andreach
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.36
Regina Hickl-Szabo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Jenni Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.20
Linda Im
published
3.20
Lorraine Marks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Lara Poulos
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Kueter
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lisa Heltzel
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
McKellar Newsom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenni Johnson + Roxie Trovato4155% gamesnot enough data
Donna Coleman + McKellar Newsom213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roxie Trovato
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Alison Robinson
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Chari Buckner
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Coleen Davis
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Donna Coleman
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
3.5
Courtney Andreach
15W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
Regina Hickl-Szabo
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.36
Jenni Johnson
20W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.31
Linda Im
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.20
Lorraine Marks
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
Lara Poulos
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
Jennifer Kueter
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Heltzel
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
McKellar Newsom
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.