Teams

Fee - Luer

2022 Brevard Adult 18 & Over-Early Start · 3.0 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-12-13vs TTC - LeiterWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarisa Rushin / Renee Jiannine vs Tammy Bertolini / Jessica Martinez7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2021-12-06vs Suntree - FordLost 01
L#1 SinglesKatharyn Luer vs Amira Tolles1-6, 0-6
2021-11-29Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Nina Lloyd vs Kaye Vansickle / Lisa Shaffer3-6, 5-7
2021-11-15vs Kiwi - SalvatoreLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Marisa Rushin vs Lily Voepel / ANITA CARBONE3-6, 3-6
2021-11-08vs Rockledge -Winner - KubeLost 02
L#1 DoublesGinger Ballou / Renee Jiannine vs Deena Helton / April Sanders2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKatharyn Luer vs Jenny Mullowney4-6, 3-6
2021-11-01vs TTC - LeiterLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Debra Grayson vs Emily Criste / Emily Dwyer6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGinger Ballou / Renee Jiannine vs Mary Failla / Leslie Pankey5-7, 6-7
2021-10-25vs Suntree - FordLost 01
L#1 DoublesNina Lloyd / Katharyn Luer vs Caroline Jiborn / Lisa Stirtzinger6-7, 3-6
2021-10-18vs TTC -TaylorSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRenee Jiannine vs Milena Alicea4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Nina Lloyd vs Eileen Stapleton / Linda Hall6-4, 6-2
2021-10-11vs Kiwi - SalvatoreLost 01
L#1 DoublesAngela Hofmann / Renee Jiannine vs Yvonne Salvatore / Tracey Draper4-6, 1-6
2021-10-04vs Rockledge -Winner - KubeLost 01
L#2 DoublesErin Conway / Katharyn Luer vs Deena Helton / Jenny Mullowney4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Deborah Phillips
published 3.5
2.92
Renee Jiannine
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.91
Katharyn Luer
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Ginger Ballou
published 3
2.69
Laurie Wakins
published
2.68
Erin Conway
published 3
1.86
Debra Grayson
published 2.5
Mary Stoops
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katharyn Luer + Renee Jiannine13659% games+10.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deborah Phillips
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Renee Jiannine
104W–89L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Katharyn Luer
158W–172L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Daricca Facciobene
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Ginger Ballou
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laurie Wakins
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
2.69
3
Erin Conway
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
2.5
Debra Grayson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Mary Stoops
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicole Alvis Mulhern
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.