Teams

Lee - CCNC

2024 Sandhills Adult 18 & over · 3.0 Adult Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-23vs Zumwalt - MazarickLost 02
L#1 DoublesMurtis Worth / Drake Neff vs Tanya Sistare / Lauren Blashford2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVirginia Forbis / Cornelia Morris vs Ericka Zumwalt / Yuko Resseguie0-6, 0-6
2024-05-07vs Hasty - Highland Country ClubSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMurtis Worth / Drake Neff vs Eydie Hammaker / Meredith Weinstein4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Robinette / Cornelia Morris vs Kim Paschal / Serriah Ciccone7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-30vs Manley - Pinehurst # 9Won 10
W#3 DoublesCornelia Morris / Elizabeth Oettinger vs Vilma Mendez / Angie Simmons6-1, 6-0
2024-02-20vs Hallock - MazarickWon 10
W#2 DoublesMurtis Worth / Drake Neff vs Theresa Jones / Corinna Williamson6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Caroline Parks
published 3.5
3.06
Kelly Hough
published
2.98
Jen Barton
published
2.94
Murtis Worth
published
2.91
Jennifer Fincher
published
2.83
Drake Neff
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
Virginia Forbis
published
2.77
Meagan Lee
published
2.76
Beth Collom
published 3
2.73
Cornelia Morris
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Elizabeth Oettinger
published
2.67
Pamela Gantt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jen Barton + Meagan Lee3348% games−15.3% vs expected
Cornelia Morris + Catherine Robinette123 matchesnot enough data
Jen Barton + Catherine Robinette303 matchesnot enough data
Beth Collom + Virginia Forbis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Parks
33W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Kelly Hough
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.06
Jen Barton
22W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
Murtis Worth
15W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jennifer Fincher
18W–26L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.91
3
Drake Neff
38W–39L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Virginia Forbis
23W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Meagan Lee
12W–17L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Beth Collom
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Cornelia Morris
51W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Elizabeth Oettinger
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Catherine Robinette
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Pamela Gantt
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.