Teams

SEASCAPE SC 55MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX7.0

21 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 55&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
James Fitch
published 4
3.79
Shannon Garrett
published
3.78
Clarence Sakoda
published 4
3.68
Mike Talvensaari
published
3.51
Pete Marinovich
published
3.48
Susan Jolley
published
3.46
Tamara Tarkington
published
3.31
Janiene P Scott
published
3.30
Anne Bell
published 3.5
Greg Gaon
published 3.5
3.24
Ana Cullen
published 3.5
3.23
Rick Jacobson
published
3.19
Deborah Amrhein
published 3.5
3.11
Jeanie Aitken
published
3.02
David Tarkington
published 3.5
3.02
Mary Garrison
published
3.01
Veronica Carrillo
published
2.88
Jill Talvensaari
published
2.88
Sonia McLoughlin
published
2.68
Kate Connor
published
Scott Cullen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronica Carrillo + Pete Marinovich4359% gamesnot enough data
Scott Cullen + Ana Cullen134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Fitch
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
Shannon Garrett
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Clarence Sakoda
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
Mike Talvensaari
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Pete Marinovich
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.51
Susan Jolley
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Tamara Tarkington
21W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Janiene P Scott
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Anne Bell
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Greg Gaon
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Ana Cullen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Rick Jacobson
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Deborah Amrhein
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
Jeanie Aitken
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
David Tarkington
6W–15L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.02
Mary Garrison
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Veronica Carrillo
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Jill Talvensaari
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Sonia McLoughlin
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Kate Connor
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Scott Cullen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.