Teams

2-JByrd-Eno

2023 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 9.5 Men Evening

6 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-11vs 3-JHull-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Krisztian Toth vs Jordan Krasner / Ryan Sayko6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-10-04Won 20
W#1 DoublesLoic Didavi / Jermaine Byrd vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Heim / Jackson Naftel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-19vs 3-JHull-EnoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJermaine Byrd / James Rees vs Ryan Sayko / Jordan Krasner6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Wachter / Julien de la Mettrie vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-14vs 1-RMcClenny-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulien de la Mettrie / Garrett May vs Connor Wilkins / William Gray6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTom Letecheur / Jackson Naftel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-05vs 3-JHull-EnoWon 10
W#3 DoublesPeter Hull / Julien de la Mettrie vs Ryan Sayko / Alex Renfrow6-0, 6-0
2023-08-31vs 3-JHull-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesLoic Didavi / Julien de la Mettrie vs Jason Hull / Richard Papantonis6-2, 6-1
2023-08-22vs 1-RMcClenny-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulien de la Mettrie / Paul Wachter vs Jason Abhau / Ravi Tewari6-2, 6-4
2023-08-11vs 1-RMcClenny-EnoSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJulien de la Mettrie / Peter Hull vs Patrick Newsome / Justin Panepinto7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTom Letecheur / Jackson Naftel vs Ravi Tewari / Jason Abhau4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 9.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.41 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.86
Julien de la Mettrie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.64
Loic Didavi
published
4.55
Paul Wachter
published
4.18
Jackson Naftel
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.17
William Calhoun
published
4.04
Jermaine Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jermaine Byrd + Julien de la Mettrie4181% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Julien de la Mettrie
77W–20L career · 6 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.86
Loic Didavi
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.64
Paul Wachter
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.55
4.5
Jackson Naftel
66W–59L career · 7 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
William Calhoun
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · 10 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.