Teams

Served with Sass

2026 Corpus Christi COMBO USTA League · Ladies 6.5 Flight

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-23vs Combo LocasLost 02
L#2 DoublesVicki Jamison / Romy Brewer vs Grace Hammack / Sarah Sivils3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Martinez / Jill Leland vs Beki Hall / Lisa Garcia2-6, 4-6
2026-08-22vs Tennisy WhiskeySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichal Funk / Katherine Read vs Leslie Gonzalez / Cindy Premchan1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTaylor Jones / Cynthia Winkley vs Chimene Burnett / ISLA LARA6-2, 5-2
2026-08-22vs Double DownLost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Leland / Jennifer Martinez vs Sima Nasr / Starrla Rodriguez3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichal Funk / Cassie Trevino vs Jasmin Escutia / Brenda Escutia Woods4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesVicki Jamison / Romy Brewer vs Gabriela Dalton / Beatrice Villarreal6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Ladies 6.5 Flight
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tennisy Whiskey000000
2Combo Locas000000
3Served with Sass000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Vicki Jamison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Jill Leland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Michal Funk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Romy Brewer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Cynthia Winkley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.34
Katherine Read
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Jennifer Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Cassie Trevino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vicki Jamison + Romy Brewer224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Martinez + Cynthia Winkley134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vicki Jamison
44W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Jill Leland
23W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
Michal Funk
1W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
Romy Brewer
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.85
3
Cynthia Winkley
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Katherine Read
13W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.34
Jennifer Martinez
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Cassie Trevino
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.