Teams

KY/Hen/STABENFELDT, Sandy

2022 USTA COMBO 18 & OVER Henderson · 7.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-29Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDebra Decker / Billie Heckel vs Nicole Newland / Leah Marlow-Wedeking2-6
2022-09-22vs KY/Hen/BARRON, DianaLost 01
L#3 DoublesStacy Lambert / Debra Decker vs Nicole Newland / Pamela Marshall3-6, 2-6
2022-09-15vs KY/Hen/BARRON, DianaLost 01
L#3 DoublesDebra Decker / Laurie Austin vs Kayla Arnott / Julie Flittner6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2022-09-01vs KY/Hen/BARRON, DianaWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Sumner / Debra Decker vs Melanie Humbert / Linda Stroud6-3, 7-6
2022-08-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Sumner / Debra Decker vs Jaimie Humbert / Nicole Newland6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Brandy Harpenau
published 4
3.71
Karen Sumner
published
3.41
Randi Conrad
published
3.38
Sandy Stabenfeldt
published
3.31
Stacy Lambert
published
3.30
Debra Decker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Dawn Conrad
published 3.5
3.23
Laurie Austin
published
2.97
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randi Conrad + Dawn Conrad131549% games+4.4% vs expected
Stacy Lambert + Sandy Stabenfeldt9457% games−1.0% vs expected
Courtney LeBarron + Sandy Stabenfeldt322153% games−4.1% vs expected
Stacy Lambert + Brandy Harpenau3444% games−9.9% vs expected
Randi Conrad + Karen Sumner8062% gamesnot enough data
Debra Decker + Sandy Stabenfeldt2350% gamesnot enough data
Stacy Lambert + Debra Decker303 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Lambert + Courtney LeBarron213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brandy Harpenau
53W–40L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Karen Sumner
79W–41L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Randi Conrad
67W–41L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Sandy Stabenfeldt
71W–41L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
Stacy Lambert
69W–33L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Debra Decker
146W–136L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Dawn Conrad
58W–66L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Laurie Austin
48W–60L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Courtney LeBarron
38W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.