Teams

Paso Perry MXD 8.0 40+

USTA MXD DOUBLES 40 & OVER · CC USTA MXD 8.0 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-10vs Monarch Dunes MXD 8.0 40+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKeith Cramer / Darcia Stebbens vs Diane Braun / Brian McEachron5-7, 2-6
2022-09-03vs Monarch Dunes MXD 8.0 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesRob Garcia / Darcia Stebbens vs Mark Minnoch / Stacie Reeve6-1, 7-6
2022-08-27vs CC-LLW-Avila GordonLost 01
L#2 DoublesDarcia Stebbens / Keith Cramer vs Stephen Lakowske / Lynette Branch3-6, 3-6
2022-08-13vs Monarch Dunes MXD 8.0 40+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDarcia Stebbens / Keith Cramer vs Mark Minnoch / Jen Haskell0-6, 2-6
2022-08-06vs CC-LLW-Avila GordonLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarcia Stebbens / Gary Amadio vs Ken Johnston / Patty Lopez1-6, 3-6
2022-07-30vs SLOCC Ricci MXD 8.0 40+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDarcia Stebbens / Keith Cramer vs Paige Esparza / David Hardisty0-6, 2-6
2022-07-16vs CC-LLW-Avila GordonLost 01
L#3 DoublesDarcia Stebbens / Keith Cramer vs Lisa Corrente / Marty Crider2-6, 0-6
2022-06-12vs SLOCC Ricci MXD 8.0 40+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDarcia Stebbens / Keith Cramer vs Stephanie Ventura / Clay Schroeder1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA MXD 8.0 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Darcia Stebbens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Anji Perry
published 4
3.15
Gretel Crum
published 3.5
3.14
Tammy Lawson
published
3.12
Brett Knupfer
published 3.5
Joseph Lindquist
published
Keith Cramer
published
Leane Masterson
published
Rob Garcia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anji Perry + Darcia Stebbens5063% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darcia Stebbens
86W–55L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Anji Perry
17W–15L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
3.5
Gretel Crum
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.15
Tammy Lawson
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Brett Knupfer
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Joseph Lindquist
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Keith Cramer
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leane Masterson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rob Garcia
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.