Teams

LTFC RED

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.95 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-15vs SH YELLOWWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmy Chase / Alison Finley vs Kirklyn Simonton / Dana Henry7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesVenita Vereen vs Bea Barnes6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLori Bowling / Krista Vickery vs Suzanne Martinek / Debbie Groves1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAshley Agrelius / Jennifer Solimene vs Susan Stewart / Courtney Ring3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-07-08vs SS-LT YELLOWWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennifer Solimene / Alison Finley vs Christine Paulsson / VANESSA BERNAL4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Kondrat vs Alexandra DeBever6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPhuong Palmeiro / Megan Ryall vs Becky Hodous / Lynn Pearson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori Bowling / Venita Vereen vs Jody Walker / Carole Dagnon6-3, 6-4
2025-07-01vs PRC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Chase / Michelle Kondrat vs Meghan Bennett / Kristin Prosowski3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Agrelius / Cathie Frazzini vs Brenda Amundsen / Heather Stohlton4-6, 1-6
2025-06-24vs PCRK REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshley Agrelius / Krista Vickery vs Jody Mumaugh / Christine Aberle3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Ryall / Phuong Palmeiro vs Karmen Davis / Barbara Gentry2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLori Bowling / Jennifer Solimene vs Sally Avery / Julie Whipple3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-17vs PCC GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesPhuong Palmeiro / Megan Ryall vs Ann Ripley / Janet Perry3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Chase / Michelle Kondrat vs Lisa Hossack / Beth Misner6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLori Bowling / Krista Vickery vs Ann Siebert / Betsey Vecchiarelli6-1, 6-3
2025-06-10vs CPV BLUEWon 21
L#1 SinglesMichelle Kondrat vs Christina Kent6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCathie Frazzini / Venita Vereen vs Carla Ewing / Susan Cole6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAshley Agrelius / Krista Vickery vs Mayme McDonald / Katie Abner1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-03vs LTFC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesAlison Finley / Megan Ryall vs Jodi Little / Stacey Anderson6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesElodie de Fabrique / Michelle Kondrat vs Holly Kortum / Cherie Weaver7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAshley Agrelius / Carol Otte vs Tracy Bourque / Nancy Brooks2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Venita Vereen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.80
Michelle Kondrat
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.79
Alison Finley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Amy Chase
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Krista Vickery
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Cathie Frazzini
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Megan Ryall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Carol Otte
published 4
3.56
Jennifer Solimene
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Lori Bowling
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Elodie de Fabrique
published
3.48
Phuong Palmeiro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Ashley Agrelius
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Chase + Alison Finley16954% games+6.7% vs expected
Venita Vereen + Cathie Frazzini6062% games+6.3% vs expected
Megan Ryall + Lori Bowling2447% games+5.4% vs expected
Krista Vickery + Cathie Frazzini61346% games+4.8% vs expected
Jennifer Solimene + Lori Bowling5646% games+1.2% vs expected
Krista Vickery + Lori Bowling4545% games+1.0% vs expected
Megan Ryall + Phuong Palmeiro141248% games+0.4% vs expected
Lori Bowling + Michelle Kondrat2450% games−1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Venita Vereen
20W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Michelle Kondrat
98W–61L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Alison Finley
22W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Amy Chase
30W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Krista Vickery
67W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Cathie Frazzini
80W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Megan Ryall
111W–112L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Carol Otte
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Jennifer Solimene
65W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Lori Bowling
104W–111L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Elodie de Fabrique
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.48
4
Phuong Palmeiro
48W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Ashley Agrelius
92W–138L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.