Teams

Lowe

2023 Combo Doubles 18&Over-NE · Women 5.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.08 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Nena Lowe
published
2.99
2.91
Carley Johnston
published 3.5
2.80
Michelle Lindsey
published
2.78
Brandi Brown
published 3.5
Callan Rowley
published 3
2.73
Lacey Harden
published
2.68
Hester Lowe
published
2.59
Lauren Zuelzke
published
2.55
Sara Davis
published
2.53
Alicia Milstead
published 3
2.48
Perrish Dragovits
published
2.38
Carleigh Melton
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Lindsey + Lacey Harden4160% games+6.3% vs expected
Carleigh Melton + Ashton Scarborough404 matchesnot enough data
Sara Davis + Alicia Milstead123 matchesnot enough data
Ashton Scarborough + Callan Rowley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nena Lowe
28W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Ashton Scarborough
50W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
2.99
3.5
Carley Johnston
12W–21L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.91
Michelle Lindsey
39W–18L career · no lines in 2023
0%2%98%
2.80
3.5
Brandi Brown
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
2.78
3
Callan Rowley
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lacey Harden
24W–18L career · no lines in 2023
0%5%95%
2.73
Hester Lowe
35W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%10%90%
2.68
Lauren Zuelzke
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%26%74%
2.59
Sara Davis
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
2.55
3
Alicia Milstead
23W–30L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
2.53
Perrish Dragovits
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%54%46%
2.48
2.5
Carleigh Melton
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
0%80%20%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.